Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />One of the concerns that has been expressed by the communities to <br />the County Board members on the Authority is that Anoka County <br />seems to be marching through the process to select a site, while <br />Hennepin County is now in a holding pattern and Washington County <br />is still several months behind. The underlying concern is that <br />Anoka County will be at the front of the line, will make a site <br />selection and negate the need for a selection in either Hennepin <br />or Washington Counties. <br /> <br />We have ranked the sites based on our review of the technical <br />documents received at this point. Our review indicates that Site <br />P should be ranked the least suited of the three sites all things <br />thus far considered. This can change,however, based on the weight <br />given to various criteria as well as the extent technical criteria <br />are going to be used to make a decision. <br /> <br />Comparative Ranking of Three Sites <br />1 Most suited/or least impact <br />2 Moderate <br />3 Least suited/most impact <br /> <br />Category <br />Flora &bFauna/Endangered Species <br />Traffic <br />Cultural/Arch. <br />Clay Borrowc <br />Airport <br />Noise <br /> <br />Hydroqeoloqic Considerations <br />Horizontal Flow <br />Vertical Flow <br />Till Breach/Aquifer Contamination <br />Existing Site Contamination <br />Ability to Monitor <br />High Capacity Wells <br /> <br />Preliminary Design Considerations <br />Expansion Capability <br />Variance Required on Slopes for Volume <br />Fill in Wetlands <br />Development Costs: <br /> Ash <br /> MSW <br />Cost/Ton: <br /> Ash <br /> MSW <br /> <br /> D P Q <br />~a 2 1 <br />3 1 2 <br />1 1 1 <br /> <br /> -- 3 -- <br /> 1 2 2 <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />1 3 2 <br />1 3 2 <br />1 3 2 <br />2 3 1 <br />2 3 1 <br />1 3 2 <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />2 2 1 <br />2 2 1 <br /> <br />2 1 3 <br />3 2 1 <br /> <br />2 1 3 <br />2 3 1 <br /> <br />Did not allow site access for field investigation. <br />Did not consider traffic impacts in other communities/cover <br />material. <br />Dayton site assumed for all clay borrow. <br /> <br /> <br />