Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Sandra Ashley <br />Page 2 <br />February 14, 1991 <br /> <br />We have in the past recommended that the process be modified on <br />CUP's which are known to carry a degree of sensitivity, social or <br />environmental impact, or are likely to cause controversy. We <br />recommend that the first meeting of P&Z deal only with the public <br />hearing and any case discussion be limited to identifying specific <br />concerns regarding the applicant's submittal and testimony at the <br />hearing. Findings of fact and a draft CUP would not be developed <br />until after this first appearance at P&Z. <br /> <br />This would eliminate the need to significantly revise Findings of <br />Fact and the CUP based on what is presented at the public hearing. <br />This should result in savings of time, costs to the applicant, and <br />should not lengthen the application process since controversial <br />proposals are seldom acted on at a single P&Z meeting. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. <br /> <br />Im~c <br />Endlosure <br />File: RA9:ll-1 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br /> ii <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />