My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/09/1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1991
>
Agenda - Council - 04/09/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 9:31:42 AM
Creation date
12/10/2003 7:52:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/09/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADJUSTMENT <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> After all the opinions expressed, I still fail to <br /> accept this ordinance should be interpreted to cover <br /> an aluminum processing facility. This business is <br /> not a disposal facility. Material is received, pro- <br /> Cessed and returned to the market for use. Recyclable <br /> material is purposely withheld from solid waste disposal <br /> sites. Reference City of Ramsey Ordinance 7.72.01, <br /> Recycling License Definitions: <br /> <br /> Recyclable Material~ means materials that are separated from mixed <br />municipal solid waste by the generator and include all items of refuse designated <br />by the t-Iermepin County Department of Environment and Energy to be part of an <br />authorized recycling program and which are intended for transportation, <br />processing and remanufacturing or reuse. <br /> Nonetheless, it was determined 90-05 applied. My <br /> intent at that time was to include paper, plastic, <br /> glass, cardboard, etc. Reference a portion of the memo <br /> from Bill Goodrich: <br /> "Solid Waste" is defined in part as garbage and refuse. "Refuse" <br /> is defined in part as In~bbish and rubbish is defined <br /> paper, <br /> cardboard, tin cans, glass, etc. <br /> <br />In my opinion, application of the above term definitions to the <br />proposed CUP requires that the proposed use be termed a Solid Waste <br />Management Facility under Ordinance 90-5. This opinion is reached, <br />of course, by use of the Ordinance as written. I am aware that <br />certain members of the Planning Commission believe that the <br />proposed use should not be classified as a Solid Waste Management <br />Facility as the material which would be brought in will be recycled <br />for another use and is therefore not solid waste. My reading of <br />the definitions cited above, however, leads me to believe that <br />those items are still considered solid waste, even though they will <br />be processed or recycled into another use and not discarded. There <br />simply is no other written ordinance or statute language which <br />allows me to conclude othel-wise. <br /> <br />After reading the memo, it seemed eliminating these <br />materials and only acceptin~ non-hazard6us netal~ would <br />not constitute a "solid waste facility". This memo <br />only addressed these items. Another aluminum processing <br />facility accepted scrap metals and had not been identi- <br />fied as a "solid waste facility" during it's application <br />for a revised CUP in October 1990. Ordinance 90-05 was <br />in effect at that time also. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.