My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/25/1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1991
>
Agenda - Council - 06/25/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 9:33:49 AM
Creation date
12/10/2003 10:31:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/25/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vo~,m3S/No. 10 <br />1-17'1_ V-III~LA V -- Cont/nued <br /> <br />M M~I R 155 <br /> <br /> 4. CDC. Hetm-oaexual transmission of human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymphader~opathy- <br /> associated virus. MMWR 1985;34:561-3. <br /> 5, CDC. Provisional public health services intec-a~enc¥ recommendations for screenir~g donated <br /> blood ar~ plasma for antibody to the virus causi~ a4:quired immunodeficiancy synclroma. MMWR <br /> 1985;34:1-5. <br /> CDC. Prevention of acquired immune deficiency sym:lrome (AIDS): report of inter-agency recom- <br /> mendatiorm. MMWR 1983;32:101-4. <br /> 7. CDC. Antibodies to a relrovirus etiologically associated with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome <br /> (AIDS) in I;>Opulations with increased inc~e~ces of Ihe syndrome. MMWR 1984;33:377-9. <br /> 8. CDC. Recommendations for assistir~g in the pcevefltion of perinata~ transmission of human T- <br /> lymphotropic virus type Ill/lymphadenopathy-associated virus and acquired immunodaficiency syn- <br /> drome. MMWR 1985;34:721-32. <br /> 9. Jt,~lson FN. Bodin G.c. Levin MJ. Ehret JM. IMaster~ HB. In vitro tests demonstrate condoms provide <br /> an effective barrier against chlamydia trachomatis ami herpes simplex wrus. Abstract in Program of <br /> the International Society for STD Research. Seattle, Washington, August I -3. 1983:176. <br />10. Conant MA. Sp'icer DW, Smith CD. Herp,a-s simplex virus transmission: condom studies. Sex <br /> Transm Dis t984;11:9,~-5. <br /> <br />Report of the Recommendations of the 1985 DES Task Force <br />of the U.S, Department of Health and Human Services <br /> <br /> In 1978, the U.$. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare set up a DES (diethytstil- <br /> bestrol [a synthetic estrogen]) Task Force to review all aspects of the DES question and to de- <br /> velop recommendations regarding health issues of DES and research gaps that exist. In 1985, <br /> a second DES Task Force of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) was <br /> convened to review recent studies showing a possible increased risk of breast cancer among <br /> women given DES during pregnancy and a possible excess of precancerous abnormalities of <br /> the cervix ami vagina among women exposed to DES in utero ( 1 ). <br /> BREAST CANCER <br /> Since 1 978, results of four investigations re4evant to this issue have been published {2-5). <br />Two of these studies were randomized clinical trials reporting the long-term follow-up results <br />of the use of DES during pregnancy, tn one, 80 diabetic women received hormonal treatment, <br />and 76 diabetic women received placebos. After 29 years of follow-up, four cases of breast <br />cancer had occurred among the exposed women, and no~e, among the unexposed women (2). <br />In another study, 10 cases of breast cancer were fou~l among 319 DES-exposed women, and <br />nme, among 331 unexposed women, suggesting.thece was no excess risk. Exposure occurred <br />in theeafly 1 950s. <br /> Two observational follow-up studies of women tTeated with DES during pregnancy have <br />also been reported recently (4,5). In these studies, the overall relative risk of breast cancer <br />among the exposed women ranged from 1.2 to 1.5. One study noted that there was no in- <br />creased risk in the first 20 years of follow-up but that the relative risk rose to 1.6 during the <br />20-29 years after exposure and to 2,5 for those followed 30 years or more 15}. The t 985 Task Force concluded that: <br /> 1. These levels of excess risk are difficult to evaluate, since Jt is difficult to rule out various <br /> sources of bias that could be responsible for such excesses. <br /> 2. In the two observational studies, the interp~tation involves assessing whether the <br /> excess risks are due to the dru~ itself or to the indications fo,' the use of the drug. Data <br /> from two recent studies suggest that spontar~ous abortion before a first b~rth is a risk <br /> factor for the development of breast cancer (6, 7). In the observational studies, a pri- <br /> mary indication of DES use was previous spontaneous abortion. The Task Force felt it <br /> would be useful to analyze the data on risk according to frequency of spontaneous <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.