Laserfiche WebLink
Steve Lundberg, 707 Isanti Parkway, Isanti, commented on the importance of safety education <br />and stated his support to allow the business to operate as it is a safe use. <br />There being no additional public comment, Mayor Strommen thanked the public for the input <br />offered and staff for its thorough investigation of this request. She then turned discussion to the <br />City Council. <br />Councilmember Riley stated this ordinance amendment had been fully discussed and the Council <br />needs to be focused on facts, not fears or perceptions. He found this use to not be a safety issue, <br />noting Police Chief Way, the Planning Commission, and staff have fully vetted this issue. <br />Motion by Councilmember Riley, seconded by Councilmember Tossey, to waive the City <br />Charter requirement to read the ordinance aloud and adopt Ordinance #14-01 An Amendment to <br />Chapter 117 of the City Code, which Chapter is Known as Zoning and Subdivisions of the City <br />Code of Ramsey, Minnesota and Amending City Code Section 117 -114 (B -1 General Business <br />District) and Adding a Section Titled "Indoor Shooting Ranges." <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Backous stated it is important to understand the Council did <br />not seek a shooting range but a private property owner found this tenant for his building and this <br />process was then started. He indicated it is not the business of the City to find another location <br />and he finds the proposed use to be completely safe for surrounding businesses and homes. <br />Councilmember Backous stated if he had any concerns relating to safety, he would not have <br />supported it in the first place. But, unfortunately the Council finds itself in the middle of a <br />Second Amendment debate and he is receiving hundreds of e -mails from across the State. <br />Councilmember Backous noted the owners of Little Me Child Care were asked repeatedly to <br />participate in this decision including being handed a meeting notice but they made no response <br />so the reasonable conclusion was that it was not of concern to them. He stated the Council made <br />it a priority to be as transparent and inclusive as possible to assure every person is heard, which <br />has occurred. He stated Total Defense participated fully in the process and the City fulfilled its <br />obligation to notify and solicit input from Little Me Child Care. It is the responsibility of Little <br />Me Child Care to notify its customers and he thinks if they had been brought into the process, <br />their fears would have been addressed. Councilmember Backous stated it is especially appalling <br />that after so many invitations to participate and express input, the Council is just now hearing <br />from Little Me Child Care yet they contacted reporters and portrayed themselves as being the <br />victim. He stated citizens need to be involved in the process, not threaten or picket or call <br />reporters. He urged the Council to support its prior position that was based on findings of fact <br />that have not changed. Councilmember Backous closed his comments by quoting Thomas <br />Jefferson relating to government by the majority who participate. <br />Councilmember Tossey stated two weeks ago, the Council discussed First Reading of this <br />ordinance and conditional use. At that time, the issue was property rights and honoring an <br />agreement between a private property owner and private business. He stated it would have been <br />insincere for the City to try and stop that transaction. Councilmember Tossey stated since that <br />meeting, he has received an e -mail from the owner of Little Me Day Care and then the following <br />week learned it was going to be on the news and had become a gun rights and safety issue. <br />Councilmember Tossey explained that for 18 years of his adult life, he has been around guns, is a <br />City Council / February 11, 2014 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />