My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/09/91
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1991
>
01/09/91
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2025 12:49:33 PM
Creation date
12/11/2003 3:55:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
01/09/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE #12: Health and Life Insurance for 1991 <br /> <br />Mr. McAloney explained the case as presented to the Personnel <br />Committee In November and the LOGIS plan seemed to be the most <br />logical. It was submitted to the Council. Since then new <br />information has become available. Due to changes in the LOGIS <br />pollcy, if the coverage Is extended to regular part-time employees, <br />the City cf Ramsey must contribute 50 to .75 percent of the <br />insurance premium cost, which would result in an additional cost to <br />the City of $700 to $1,300 per year per regular part-time employee. <br />At this time, there is only one part-time employee; however, it <br />would apply to every part-time employee hired In the future whether <br />they needed it or not. She recommended approving the 1991 health <br />and life Insurance with LOGIS for full-time, benefit-earning <br />employees only. <br /> <br />MOTION by DeLuca, Seconded by Pearson, adopting Resolution <br />R~gO-12-S75 health and llfe insurance through Local Government <br />Information Systems (LOGIS) for benefit-earning employees. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />CASE ~13: Consider Employment Agreement of City Acimlnistrator <br /> <br />Mr. Hart]ey submitted his letter of resignation which is contingent <br />upon approval of a Resolution granting him three months severance <br />pay. He stated he believes thls ls In the best interest of the <br />Clty. <br /> <br />Attorney GooOrich aOvised the Statute allows a City to grant <br />severance pay for up to one year. In reviewing Mr. Hart]ey's <br />Employment Agreement, which is for the years 1990 and lggl, if the <br />Council wanted to dismiss him, he would have to be paid a one-year <br />increment. It was his opinion that it may be a benefit to the City <br />to pay the three-month increment rather than one year of severance <br />pay if the new Council would dismiss him. <br /> <br />MOTION by Cich, Seconded by Pearson, to move Resolution ~q0-12- <br />376 (three months severance pay for Mr. Hart]ey and accepting his <br />resignation) FURTHER DISCUSSION: Counci]memDer Pearson hated to <br />see Mr. Hart]ey leave, feeling there was a good workin~ <br />relationship and that he had ~one a fine job for the City. <br /> <br />DpuG Fountain - stated as a representative of the community, he <br />is sorry to see Mr. Hart]ey leave, statin~ Mr. Hart]ey aid a <br />wonderful 3ob. He thanked him for his services. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: Carr-le~ unanimously, <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL/DECEMBER Page 16 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.