Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Goodrich proceeded with Findings #4. The only changes there were to correct typos. <br />Findings # 5 through 4t21 remained unchanged. Mr. (~oodrich asked City Council if everyone <br />had a chance to read and review the Attorney General's Report, the City of Phoenix Report, the <br />Indianapolis Stud>', the City of Rochester Stud)', the report prepared by the planner hired for this <br />project, and if everyone was present on May 29, October 10th, and April 24th. All answered <br />positive that they had read and reviewed each report and/or stud), and also that the), had attended all <br />meetings except Councilmember Cich missed the meeting on October 10th. Mr. Goodrich stated <br />adult uses are protected constitutionally, however, because of secondary impacts, zoning is the <br />only way the City has of regulating these uses. The secondary impacts include increased crime, <br />deterioration of property and bad influence on our children. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca stated it is the concern of the Council to provide for the health, safety and <br />welfare of its community. It does have an impact because of an increase in sexual crimes and child <br />abduction and he feels that the Council is working along the fight lines to provide for Ramsey's <br />residents. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann commented that the Attorney General's report did a good job of incorporating <br />studies from other cities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cich stated that his feelings regarding adult use establishments is that it leads to <br />the degradation of municipalities. <br /> <br />Attorney Goodrich proceeded to read and review the Conclusions. Conclusions #1 through #3 <br />remain unchanged. Conclusion #4 was read and it was noted that churches had been omitted. <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated that it was her understanding that churches should be protected <br />as far as what is allowed to operate next to them, however, churches are free to locate where ever <br />they want to or feel the need to. <br /> <br />It was decided that Conclusion #4 should read "Adult uses should be located in areas of the City <br />which are not in close proximity to parks, schools, child care facilities, churches and residential <br />neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Conclusion #5 contained a typo, the word "not" was inadvertently omitted. It should read <br />"Regardless of whether or not ... It was agTeed that Conclusions #6 and #7 remain unchanged. <br />Conclusions #8 and #9 remain the same except when it reads entertainment uses it should be <br />changed to adult uses. Conclusion #10 should be changed to include the word churches and also <br />insert adult use for entertainment use. There was discussion regarding the measurement of 1,000 <br />feet as opposed to 750~ Attorney Goodrich stated it was presented to Planning and Zoning as 750' <br />and they suggested 1,000'. Discussion also took place regarding the percentage of total area a City <br />has to allow for adult use establishments. Conclusion #11 should read "Based upon the reports of <br />other cities, the A.G.'s Report, the September 20th Planning Report prepared by Northwest <br />Associated Consultants, Inc., and this City's two public hearings .... "Conclusion #12 should be <br />added and reads as follows: "It is not the intent of this Council to further regulate the location of <br />churches or church related organizations". <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cich and seconded bv Councilmember Peterson to adopt the Proposed <br />Findings (as amended) regarding the Adult Use ~rudy. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mavor Reimann, Councilmembers Cich, Peterson, DeLuca. and <br />Pearson. Voting No: None <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Pearson and seconded by Counciimember Peterson to accept the <br />Conclusions (as amended) regarding the Adult Use Study. <br /> <br />City Council/November 13, 1990 <br /> Page 13 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />