05/08/91 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mrs. Helling also noted that In addition, the terms of two Charter Cormmtssion members have expired, those of Ms. Barbara Graen and Mr. Bernard Steffen, but they have reapplted for their positions. She recommended the Council reappoint them this evening. Mr. John T. Goods adOressed the Councl) regarding his desire to serve on the Charter Commission. He has lived In the City for more than a year, but has owned rea] estate In Ramsey for three years. He would like to play an Intregal part while Ramsey grows and continues to offer a high quality of life In the Metropolitan area. He stated he has not served on a commission before, but he has obtained a copy of the City's Charter, which he considers the "constitution" of the City. Mr. Rodney Nelson explained he has lived In Ramsey about one and a half years and moved here with the intent of giving something to the cormmunlty. That Is what prompted him to apply for the Charter Conrnission. He hoped to serve on the commission and provide his Input. He has not served on a oo~nlsslon before. MOTION by Counclimember Peterson, Seconded by Councllmember Beyer, to reappoint Ms. Barbara Graen and Mr. Bernard Steffen to the Charter Commission, and to appoint Mr. Goode at this tlme and Mr. Nelson effective May 12, 1991. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor G11bertson, Councllmembers Hardin, Peterson, Beyer and Clch. Voting No: None. The Councll also agreed to advertise for the remaining vacancies on the commission in the Ramsey Resident. CASE Request for Final Plat Approval of Echo Ridge; Case of Gerald Bauer Ms. Frolik explained the request of Gerald Bauer to approve the final plat of Echo Ridge located east of St. Francis Boulevard and 1??th Avenue NW. The Planning Corrm~lssion recoIIlmen~s approval of the plat and waiving the requirement for paving 1??th within the boundaries of the plat. Mr. Jankowski reviewed the lot configuration of the area which is current)y in ownership Dy two owners. It consists of three tots, the third one being landlocked. He expects the developer to come back wlth 1??th as a street that will De extended to the east at some time in the future. The City will be requiring the developer to extend it at least a distance of 266 feet so that the future owners of Lots 2 and 3 can extend that road mutually exclusive of each other. Normal)y the developer would De expected to upgrade the street to a hard surface pavement. In this situation, the person to the south would benefit greatly from Mr. Bauer paving the road without having to pay anything toward it. CITY COUNCIL/APRIL 9, 1991 Page 4 of I1