Laserfiche WebLink
Sub-Area'B' - Hageman Holdings [NOTE: discussion also added other Hageman Holdings <br />ro s erties to the north <br />Open to a project in the short/near-term <br />• Focus = business park <br />• Open to the concept of retail <br />• Future school will provide its own buffer for compatibility <br />• Written Comments: <br />o Industrial/business <br />o Retail option <br />o Not the school area or land on Alpine = residential <br />o Residential north half <br />o Industrial park south half j <br />Hageman Residential Portion (36Acres along Alpine Drive) <br />• High quality architecture <br />• Single-family feel <br />• Allow for some clustering with permanent buffer <br />• See Saint Michael example <br />o Hans Hagen development adjacent to J & B Group <br />o Medium density with screening/buffer <br />■ Twin -homes; small -lot single-family <br />Future School Site (North of Bunker and Sub -Area 'B) <br />• Current vision remains a school (user to be determined) or other youth -focused <br />philanthropic endeavor <br />• If unable to develop as a school: <br />o Potential for retail development (first choice) <br />o Also potential for a business park <br />• Existing standards may be too restrictive <br />o Continue quality standards on the facade <br />o Default to traditional bulk standards (setbacks, parking, etc.) <br />• Potential/need for frontage roads <br />• Potential for railroad crossings and/or railroad spurs <br />• Hageman Holdings OK with concept of adjacent retail (Sub -Area 'B') <br />• Market should drive scale of retail <br />o Large-scale (big -box) or small/medium-scale (convenience, food, etc.). <br />o Not quite at the stage to fully determine where exact locations or large, medium, <br />or small scale should be - let the market drive <br />• Reduced visibility due to Armstrong Interchange <br />• Need taller signs <br />• Written Comments: <br />o Retail as best fit for the new interchange, etc. <br />o Industrial park to the west <br />