Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Riley introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #14-03-055 <br /> <br /> <br />RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT <br />DISTRICT AUTHORITY FOR CITIES <br /> <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, <br />HF 745/SF 607 would allow cities to create street improvement districts; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br />just as the State has fallen behind in making transportation investments, <br />some cities faced with budget challenges have made the difficult decision in recent years to hold <br />off on scheduled street projects; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br />maintenance projects, such as sealcoating and overlays, can prolong the <br />lifecycle of streets to 50 to 60 years; however, without on-going maintenance, the average life <br />expectancy of local streets is approximately 25 to 30 years, which equates to every $1 spent on <br />maintenance, a road authority saves $7 in repairs; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br />cities are also falling behind on the reconstruction projects necessary to help <br />keep property values stable; and cities lack viable options for building new transportation <br />infrastructure to attract and retain investments by businesses that keep Minnesota’s economy <br />strong; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br />special assessments as a funding mechanism are becoming more difficult to <br />implement. They can be onerous for property owners and increasingly result in expensive <br />litigation for cities. Additionally, special assessments are not always useful for funding collector <br />streets and other streets that do not abut private property; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br />Municipal State Aid (MSA) as a funding mechanism is limited. It cannot <br />be applied to more than 20% of a MSA City’s lane miles. Existing MSA is not keeping up with <br />needs on the MSA system; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br />there are competing priorities for property tax dollars as a funding <br />mechanism. Property taxes are generally not dedicated and are sometimes diverted to more <br />pressing needs such as public safety, water quality, and cost participation in state and county <br />highway projects. When road projects are deferred, the increased cost make them even more cost <br />prohibitive. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA; as follows: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1)That the City of Ramsey hereby supports legislation that would provide cities with an <br />additional tool to build and maintain city streets. <br /> <br /> <br />2)That this is enabling legislation. No city would be required to create a street <br />improvement district. <br /> <br /> <br />