Laserfiche WebLink
Our Missio n.. To worktogether to resp onsi lygrow ourco nemunity and top noir id q uality, co st-effectar e, and ef&cientgovernmentset y ices <br />CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 03/25/2014 <br />By: Mark Riverblood, Engineering/Public Works <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Advance Construction of Portions of the Mississippi River Trail <br />7.3. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />In 2009 and 2011, City Council authorized the application for Transportation Enhancement grant funding for constructing the Mississippi River Trail (MRT) <br />across the city. The 2009 grant application requested funds for constructing an easterly segment of the MRT connecting the City of Anoka's MRT (on King's <br />Island) to the Mississippi West Regional Park. Then the 2011 grant application requested funds for constructing the westerly segment from the Mississippi West <br />Regional Park to city limits west of MnDOT's Wayside Rest facility. Both of these competitive grant applications for Federal funds were successful. <br />The eastern project from the City of Anoka to the Mississippi West Regional Park was awarded for construction and is scheduled to be completed in 2014. The <br />western segment of the MRT grant in Ramsey was awarded in 2011 in the amount of $1,120,000 for State fiscal year 2016, which runs from July 2015 through <br />June 2016. These Transportation Enhancement projects, administered by MnDOT to Federal construction standards, have a grant cycle with a'call' for proposals <br />each year, with the monies generally available 4 to 5 years from award. This was the case with both of these two MRT projects. <br />While grant applications are written with the best information available at the time, conditions can change in the years between award and implementation. The <br />purpose of this case to highlight the favorable change in conditions, and receive Council approval to proceed with a plan to advance construct portions of the <br />MRT, concurrent with certain roadway improvements in a manner that doesn't jeopardize the two reimbursement grants. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />In 2012, the City of Ramsey received approval to proceed with the easterly segment of the MRT, with westerly termini at the 'outfall trail' consistent with one of <br />the alignments depicted within the original grant application (attachment 1). Since then, a Cooperative Agreement project was approved for the reconstruction <br />of Riverdale Drive from Armstrong Boulevard to the cul-de-sac east of Alpaca Street. This same project includes the extension of Riverdale Drive from the east <br />end of the reconstruction project to Traprock Street. The easterly MRT project will be timed such that when the extension of Riverdale Drive is complete, the <br />trail will be paved immediately thereafter to the location of the outfall trail, meeting the terms of the grant award, and thus being eligible for reimbursement. <br />The Riverdale Drive Extension/Reconstruction project easily accommodates the MRT grant -funded project without concern for eligibility to receive <br />reimbursement - as the required Project Memorandum had previously been approved authorizing the construction. However, the westerly MRT project has not <br />been approved for construction. This presents a practical problem, as the city would be in the position of inconveniencing residents and business owners for the <br />Riverdale Drive reconstruction in 2014 - only to receive subsequent approval for the westerly MRT project, with more construction activity to occur in exactly <br />the same right-of-way. Further, the city would pay for all the same traffic control signage and other similar redundant costs. <br />The other change in condition that occurred since the 2011 MRT award is significant progress on the Armstrong Interchange project. Similar to the above <br />construction sequencing, the desire would be to construct a portion of the westerly MRT project with the interchange construction project to maximize <br />efficiencies for all stakeholders. However, because the MRT grant is Federally funded, not only would the necessary early notification documents and Project <br />Memorandum need to be completed in advance of the bid documents and bidding (with other approvals as well); all elements of the MRT project would need to <br />meet Federal standards. It would therefore be more cost efficient for the city to pay for advance construction of the MRT with the interchange; than it would be <br />to separately perform the work with grant monies after the interchange is constructed. Plus, there would be the public appearance of project completion, only to <br />witness traffic control signage coming down, then going back up at a later date, with the same grading, redundant mobilization, restoration, etc. <br />Given the above challenges relating to the MRT, Staff feels that it is best to proceed with advance construction of the MRT through both the Riverdale Drive <br />Extension/Reconstruction and Armstrong Boulevard Interchange projects. As implied, this would authorize the city to proceed with construction of these <br />segments of the MRT using local funds initially, and understanding that the reimbursement would not occur until sometime during State fiscal year 2016. <br />Staff met with MnDOT administrators of the Federal funds for the MRT project and believes that there is a possibility that the entire $1,120,000 may be <br />retained for the westerly MRT project if advance construction is authorized as part of the required Project Memorandum. As noted earlier, the City would be <br />required to advance fund the two segments of the MRT that are constructed in advance, but then be reimbursed from the awarded grant funds during State fiscal <br />year 2016. <br />Another point may be made here, and that is that the Federal funds and processes for approvals are very stringent and if the city were to pave trail segments <br />outside of explicit MnDOT approval, it may be cause for the scope of the grant award to be such that the $1.12 million dollar grant award would be completely <br />rescinded. At a minimum, absent an approved Project Memorandum, any trail paving performed before approvals would not be eligible for reimbursement. <br />Given that the Riverdale Drive Extension/Reconstruction project is proposed to be constructed in 2014, and likewise bids could be let for the Armstrong <br />Boulevard Interchange in the fall of 2014, time is of the essence. <br />Funding Source: <br />