My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:00:07 PM
Creation date
4/28/2003 2:10:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/06/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that with a 50-foot right of way, you are losing greenspace. <br />He stated that one of the challenges Staff is up against is the policy makers have not made a <br />decision on parking rules on private streets. <br /> <br />Commissioner Reeve asked if they were leaning toward 20 feet for the one ways. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler stated that was what had been proposed the first time, than they were <br />narrowed. <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas indicated this became critical in two ways; they could make the green space smaller <br />in the association, but 60 feet right-of-ways in the public areas would make the lots too small. <br />He thought he had heard that 16 feet on the one-ways was okay. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated it was the Planning Commission's responsibility to sort this out. <br />He indicated that the current plan is not acceptable with Staff, which is why he voted against it. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if they could propose 28 feet on public streets, 24 feet on the 200 foot <br />stretch of private road and 20 feet on the one-ways, or 32 feet without the median. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if the median was okay if it was surmountable. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler stated it would depend on how high the snow is. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked how critical the median was. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjerstedt indicated it was intended to look nice and have landscaping. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked where Chairperson Nixt was at with the proposal. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated he was having second thoughts and was not sure it was ready to move <br />forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated it could be worked up between now and the City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated that working it up with a four-foot road change would be a challenge <br />and could cause a dramatic change to layout. He fells the Commission needs to review it again <br />before it goes to the City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if it was turned down here, it would go to Council. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated it would go to Council as being recommended for denial by <br />the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 6, 2003 <br /> Page 20 of 26 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.