Laserfiche WebLink
evening's agenda for City Council consideration as well. <br />The request has been forwarded to MnDOT for review/comments as the Subject Property is adjacent to Highway <br />10. As of the writing of this case, Staff has not received a response. However, it should be noted that no new access <br />from Highway 10 is proposed. Access to the expanded sales/display area will be internally through M & G Trailer <br />Sales and Service's existing parking/display area. In fact, for security purposes, the applicant will be <br />installing/extending a chain link fence around the leased area that would prohibit access to the leased area except <br />from through their existing parking lot. The site is impacted by the Highway 10 Access Planning Study initiated by <br />Mn/DOT, although the exact timing of any implementation of this study has yet to be defined. The current <br />information available as part of this study identifies this site as a full acquisition and removal of use. <br />The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at their April 3, 2014 regular meeting and there were no written <br />or verbal comments received. Much of the discussion by the Planning Commission focused on the duration of the <br />IUP. It had originally been drafted for a term of five (5) years, which is the maximum duration stated in City Code. <br />However, the City Council does have the authority to approve a duration greater than five (5) years as long as the <br />date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty. Furthermore, State Statute, as it relates to <br />interim uses, does not specify a maximum duration. Thus, the Planning Commission recommended that the duration <br />of the IUP be linked to the acquisition of the Subject Property for improvements to Highway 10 (outlined in <br />MnDOT's Access Management Plan and current Access Planning Study) or five (5) years after the date that <br />MnDOT determines the Subject Property will not be impacted by these future improvements. The Planning <br />Commission believes this is appropriate as it eliminates the need for the applicant to reapply and expend additional <br />funds in the future to request authorization to continue with the alternative surface. <br />Alternatives/Options <br />Alternative # 1: Adopt Resolutions # 14-04-067 and # 14-04-068 related to a request to utilize an alternative surface <br />for expansion of outdoor sales/display area. In the fall of 2013, the City amended the commercial off-street parking <br />regulations to provide an exemption to the bituminous/concrete surface requirement in defined areas subject to <br />future transportation improvements, including those parcels in the H-1 Highway 10 Business District. The proposed <br />expansion does comply with the standards provided in Ordinance #13-16. The duration of the IUP, as presented, is <br />tied to the date of acquisition of the Subject Property for improvements to Highway 10 or five (5) years after the <br />date that MnDOT determines the Subject Property will not be impacted by improvements to Highway 10, which, as <br />outlined in City Code, the City Council does have the authority to approve. Staff supports this option. <br />Alternative #2: Adopt amended Resolutions #14-04-067 and #14-04-068 related to a request to utilize an alternative <br />surface for expansion of outdoor sales/display area. Should the City Council be concerned with the duration of the <br />IUP, it would be appropriate to pull this case from the Consent Agenda and discuss as part of the Regular Agenda. <br />If this is the case, the IUP could be amended as part of the motion to identify a shorter duration, such as five (5) <br />years, which has been typical in past practice. <br />Alternative #3: Do not adopt (deny) Resolutions #14-04-067 and #14-04-068 related to a request to utilize an <br />alternative surface for expansion of outdoor sales/display area. It appears that the proposed improvements comply <br />with the standards outlined in Ordinance #13-16 and thus, Staff does not support this option. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the applicant's responsibility. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Planning Commission recommends approving Resolutions #14-04-067 and #14-04-068 to allow the use of an <br />alternative surfacing material (Class V gravel) until such time that the Subject Property is acquired for <br />improvements to Highway 10 or to five (5) years after the date that MnDOT determines the Subject Property will <br />not be impacted by improvements to Highway 10, contingent upon the applicant entering into a Lease Agreement <br />for use of a portion of City -owned land. <br />