Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Watson, seconded by Commissioner Brauer to recommend that the <br />City Council adopt the resolution approving the land use change for properties located on Rivlyn <br />Avenue from Places to Work to Low Density Residential. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Acting Chairperson Johnson, Commissioners Watson,' Brauer, and <br />Shepherd. Voting No None. Absent: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioner an Scoy. <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon noted <br />August 26, 2003. <br />Chairperson Johnson apologized to the residents involved for the inconvenience. <br />Case #5 <br />11 go to the City Counci <br />for Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Case of City of Ramsey <br />Presentation <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon advised the 2001 Comprehensive Plan <br />shows the property south of Highway 10, west of the wayside rest area as Low Density <br />Residential. At the May l', 2003 Planning Commission meeting, City Sta ' rought forward the <br />rezoning of these properties to comply . with the Comprehensive Plans. During the Public <br />Hearing, the property owners brought forward their concerns regarding changing their property <br />to R -1 Residential zoning, suggesting that business was a better use of the Highway 10 property <br />than residential. He indicated the Planning Cnrxirriission tabled action on the rezoning and <br />directed staff to forward the matter to the City Council for its consideration. <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon further advised the City Council <br />Matter the atter at their June 10, 2003,, work session. After discussing possible appropriate <br />uses for the property, theCity Council directed staff to draft a comprehensive plan amendment to <br />change the northern third of the properties to Places to Shop and the southern portion to Low <br />Density Residential. The Council indicated that residential uses were most appropriate directly <br />on the lsissippi Ria .er, whie°conunercial uses were more appropriate directly on Highway 10. <br />He indicated the parcels are large enough to accommodate both types of development in the area. <br />He stated Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br />Chairperson Johnson . asked what the zoning is on the other side of the city. Assistant <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated he does not believe Staff has an answer. He <br />thinks it is =commercial uses, but he does not know what zoning it is. <br />Public Hearing <br />Tom Austin, 9404 Highway 10, stated his home is the white stripe on the map. He indicated five <br />years ago they decided to build a home there, after purchasing the property two or three years <br />prior to that. He explained there was a home on it when they bought it that was being rented, and <br />in the process of refurbishing the house they determined it was beyond repair. When they <br />decided to build a new home they found it was zoned commercial, so he had to have it rezoned <br />residential. He indicated there was really only three lots there; one empty and two with homes. <br />He believes it should be residential, and he believes the farm already has a plat on record to <br />subdivide it. <br />Planning Commission/August 7, 2003 <br />Page 10 of 19 <br />