Rivlyn Avenue - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SURVEY OF INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS OF ALL PROPERTY ON RIVLYN AVE THIS IS A RESURVEY OF PROPERTY OWNERS ON BOTH SIDES OF RIVLYN AVE NW, RAMSEY. (THIS IS TO UPDATE THE FEELINGS AND POSITIONS OF EACH PROPERTY OWNER ON THE OPTIONS /CHOICES THAT THE RAMSEY CITY COUNCIL HAS DECIDED MIGHT APPLY TO THESE PROPERTIES - AS PER COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 26, 2003.) THE RAMSEY CITY COUNCIL IS IN THE PROCESS OF UPDATING THE ZONING OF ALL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF RAMSEY SO AS TO CONFORM TO THE ZONING SPECIFIED IN THE CITY OF RAMSEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS AMENDED FEBRUARY 26, 2002. IN JULY OF 2003 THE RAMSEY CITY COUNCIL CREATED A NEW ZONE CLASSIFICATION CALLED "MIXED USE ". THIS ZONE WAS DEFINED WITH VERY SPECIFIC LIMITATIONS TO TWO (2) AREAS OF LAND: 1. THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AREA; 2. THE SMALL AREA SOUTH OF HWY. 10 JUST WEST OF FELDSPAR STREET (just east of Mississippi West Regional Park). extract from: AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 9 WHICH IS KNOWN AS THE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION OF LAND CHAPTER OF THE CITY CODE OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9.20 "ZONING DISTRICTS" OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CITY CODE OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA Intent. The intent of the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MU -PUD) District (only as to #2 above) is to provide a range of retail and service commercial, office, and residential uses that are organized and planned in a comprehensive manner. ..is created for development seeking alternative development regulations that embody more traditional neighborhood design (TND) principles to promote a better integration of uses that might typically be separated in typical suburban development. This district is appropriate for infill locations that provide opportunities to connect to adjacent development patterns. At least 70 percent of the land in the area in the development shall be in residential use. Permitted Uses. a) Offices and banks b) Enclosed retail activities without outdoor activities c) Personal and professional services d) Restaurants and cafes e) Uses allowed in the R -1,R -2 and R -3 Districts AT THE AUGUST 26TH COUNCIL MEETING WHERE OUR REZONING WAS UP FOR FINAL DECISION, COUNCILMEMBERS DECIDED THAT MAYBE THIS NEW "MIXED USE" ZONING WOULD BE A BETTER ALTERNATIVE AS COMPARED TO THE TWO CHOICES THAT PROPERTY OWNERS WERE BEING PRESENT WITH NOW. SO, OUR PROPERTY REZONING WAS SENT BACK TO A FUTURE COUNCIL WORK SESSION TO BE DISCUSSED. (over)