My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 01/21/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2003
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 01/21/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 4:17:03 PM
Creation date
4/29/2003 8:46:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/21/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Principal Planner Trudgeon reviewed the proposed setbacks of the development and the options <br />the Council has as it relates to density transition. He explained that if they were to require a <br />landscaping buffer there would have to be a 25-foot buffer between the new units and the <br />existing homes because it would be medium density adjacent to low density. There is adequate <br />space in the development to provide the buffer. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if there would be an opportunity to move the cottages back five feet with <br />the elimination of the trail. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that if they are passing the safety test for fire and safety they should <br />maintain as much of a buffer as possible. He noted that he would like the developer to meet with <br />the Environmental Policy Task Force to discuss the buffer and the planting of additional trees. <br /> <br />Paul Kangas, Loucks and Associates, explained that they are trying to develop something new in <br />the community by using smaller lots and making them very marketable. What concerned him is <br />that some of the things they hoped to provide has been talked about being eliminated from the <br />plan. He stated that the initial sketch plan war a better layout appearance wise, but does not <br />work with larger public right-of-way. They have dropped the unit count from 129 to 115 to <br />reduce the density. They are trying to be good neighbors by addressing .the concerns of the <br />existing neighbors. Surprisingly they are finding that trails are being seen as negative, when <br />normally they are viewed as a positive. Residents were concerned about the narrower lots so <br />they widened them. Mr. Kangas explained that he has been given a mandate from the owners <br />group to get at least 115 units on the property. Some of the issues with wider street~ and wider <br />rights-of-ways pushes the units to the perimeter and some of the things that make it a quality <br />development is the narrower streets and boulevards. Nobody disputes the fact that the <br />development has to be safe but there are many examples of communities that have narrower <br />streets. The development was modeled after Liberty on the Lakes in Stillwater that has the <br />narrow streets. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that it seemed as if everyone was comfortable with the 115 unitS being <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon noted that the wider roads do not impact the number of units. The <br />only thing t. hat might impact the number of units is the connection to Tungsten Street. <br /> <br />Mr. Kangas stated that with the wider street width requirement there is land that is lost. He <br />stated that they are asking the Council to take a creative look at the layout of the development by <br />using the planned unit development process. The homeowner's association agreements can be <br />written so that the private streets are maintained by the homeowners association. They are not <br />proposing anything that would be a detriment to the community. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if they were to compromise on a 30 foot wide road wOuld staff be <br />comfortable with that. <br /> <br />City Council/January 21, 2003 <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.