Laserfiche WebLink
project bills, one funded by cash and the other through the sale of bonds. The Armstrong <br />Boulevard Interchange project was to be funded through the bonding initiative. That fund <br />contained two projects, the Armstrong Boulevard Interchange at $8 million and a Richfield <br />underpass project at $2.5 million. It also contained $29 million beyond what the two projects <br />were designated to get. The Local Road Advisory Committee determines how to use those <br />additional funds by soliciting projects, statewide, and unfortunately decided to include Ramsey's <br />and Richfield's projects into the solicitation process. The project solicitation process occurs <br />through the fall and into the winter with a proposal deadline in January. Most likely, the <br />Committee will receive requests for more projects than funding is available. In February, the <br />Committee determines the projects to be funded and in March, it announces award of the funds. <br />Mr. Tinklenberg stated the Armstrong Boulevard Interchange project had been designated by the <br />Legislature and should not have been included within the solicitation project. He stated he found <br />that to be an inappropriate process and reported on conversations he has already held about this <br />error, including House and Senate leadership, Chairs of the' Transportation Committees in both <br />the House and Senate, Mn/DOT, and the Governor's office. As a result, there has been a <br />movement on the part of the Department to reconsider that process. Mr. Tinklenberg explained <br />that he has argued that the Armstrong Boulevard Interchange is a great project to demonstrate <br />what the project can do to improve infrastructure and the importance of starting that project in <br />the same year that it was approved by the Legislature for funding. In addition, he has pushed for <br />a groundbreaking ceremony this fall to assure it keeps moving forward. Mr. Tinklenberg stated <br />he anticipates this issue will be resolved shortly as there has been tremendous support for <br />changing the process. <br />Mayor Strommen stated she assumes the City of Richfield had the same position as Ramsey. <br />Mr. Tinklenberg confirmed that was the case and the City of Richfield had been effective in <br />voicing the same concern. <br />Mayor Strommen thanked Mr Tinkenberg for his diligence in moving the Armstrong Boulevard <br />Interchange forward. <br />Mr. Tinldenberg stated another important thing with having a groundbreaking this fall is that <br />everybody in the area working on Highway 10 sees Ramsey's work on the Armstrong Boulevard <br />exchange as the model for how to move a project along so they all take heart in Ramsey's <br />success. <br />The Council thanked Mr Tinklenberg for his work on the City's behalf <br />City Administrator Ulrich reported that North Metro Mayor's Association is organizing a <br />Highway 169/Highway 10 Corridor Coalition comprised of several communities to help fund <br />continued legislative efforts. He stated Mr Tinklenberg is under contract to look at a multi -city <br />funding effort. This will be considered by the Council at a future meeting during budget <br />discussion. <br />City Council Work Session / July 22, 2014 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />