Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 4. Secchi readings 2012 & 2013 for Site 201 <br />Depth (meters) <br />Secch Readings <br />N N N N N Ni N N N N N N Ni N CO CO M CO CO M CO CO M CO CO M M <br />%--I Ni %--I %--I %--I Ni %--I %--I %--I Ni %--I %--I %--I %--I Ni %--I %--I %--I M %--I %--I %--I M %--I %--I %--I M %--I %--I %--I M M %--I %--I %--I %--I <br />0' 0 00' 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0' 0 0 0' 0 00' 0 0 0%-1, 0 0 0 0 <br />Ni 0 N N N 0 N N N 0 N N N N 0 N N N 0 N N N 0 N N N 0 N N N 0 0 N N N N <br />m. Ll N 0000 . M 0 O N 0000 r\-I VD 0\ LD M 0000 \ M 0 L! \ 0 0000 Ch\\ LD M 0000 0 <br />N 00 rl N N l0 i--I N N M i i r i N (NI i--I r-I (NI N %--I N N LD %--I N N M %--I %--I N N a) %--I N N %--1 <br />\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ <br />L.f) l0 l0 l0 l0 00 00 000 00 00 Q) Q) Q) Q) u) u) u) L.f) l0 l0 l0 l0 00 00 00 00 00 Q) <br />0 <br />0.5 <br />1 <br />1.5 <br />2 <br />Summary <br />■ 2012 <br />■ 2013 <br />Grass Lake <br />2 year mean <br />NCHF <br />Standard <br />Grass Lake has very good water quality and appears to be fully meeting the thresholds set to protect shallow lakes in the <br />NCHF ecoregion for aquatic recreation (Table 3). <br />Grass Lake's shallow nature, <br />combined with its location, make <br />it susceptible to an influx of <br />nutrients as well as pollutants <br />such as chloride. Engagement at <br />the local level will be required to <br />maintain Grass Lake's high level <br />of water quality. <br />Table 3. A comparison of water quality data from Grass Lake to the shallow lake <br />eutrophication standards for the NCHF ecoregion <br />TP (pg/L) Chl-a (pg/L) Secchi (m) <br />Thresholds set to protect shallow <60 <20 >1.0 <br />lakes in the NCHF ecoregion for <br />aquatic recreation use <br />Grass Lake 2-year summer mean <br />values <br />13 5.8 1.3 <br />Recommendations: <br />• Continue to participate in the CLMP and regularly collect transparency data to provide the continuous water quality <br />records needed for trend assessment. <br />• Engage with city and county officials to ensure protection of wetlands in the surrounding watershed. Wetlands trap <br />and filter sediments and nutrients, limiting their eventual run-off into Grass Lake. <br />• Best management practices should be used when applying road deicers. Specifically, minimize the salting of roads <br />near the lake, and stockpile snow in upland areas away from the Lakeshore. Grass Lake had chloride concentrations <br />higher than the ecoregion expectations. This is most likely due to "urban" runoff. <br />• Maintain native aquatic plant beds to support fishery habitat. Native aquatic plants also provide natural wave breaks <br />and results in decreased shoreline erosion. Increased wave action stirs lake sediments, clouding the water, making it <br />difficult for new plants to grow. <br />Grass Lake (02-0113) • August 2014 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />5 <br />