Laserfiche WebLink
Chlorophyll -a (a pigment found in algae) is used to estimate the amount of algal production in a lake and, therefore, the <br />lake's response to nutrients. As would be anticipated with the low total phosphorus results found in Grass Lake, the <br />chlorophyll —a summer mean concentration was also quite low. The mean summer concentration of chlorophyll -a was <br />5.8 ug/L. With concentrations from 10-20 ug/L indicating a mild algal bloom and concentrations greater than 30 ug/L <br />indicating severe nuisance conditions, an algal bloom on Grass Lake in 2012 or 2013 would have been a rare occurrence, <br />if at all. <br />Secchi transparency measures the depth of <br />water clarity in a lake. Grass Lake's average <br />two year transparency is 1.3 meters (4.3 <br />feet). Several transparency readings were at <br />lake bottom and in other instances, the <br />presence of rooted vegetation prevented an <br />"at bottom" reading. <br />In some lakes, high total suspended sediment <br />or high color may also limit transparency. <br />High total suspended sediment may arise <br />from suspended sediments (e.g. from runoff <br />or wind mixing). In the case of Grass Lake, the <br />total suspended sediment is within the <br />typical range for NCHF lakes. <br />Chloride (CI) for Grass Lake was worse than <br />the typical range for NCHF lakes (Table 2). <br />The primary source of CI to Minnesota lakes <br />is winter application of road de-icing (road <br />salt) compounds; however, other potential <br />sources include runoff from agricultural lands, water softeners, treated wastewater effluent, and seepage from septic <br />systems. CI will likely continue to increase in the years to come since it is a conservative pollutant, meaning that it does <br />not break down or leave the lake system over time. Without further examination of the potential sources it is difficult to <br />say which one is the primary contributor for Grass Lake; however, the CI concentration in the lake is far below the water <br />quality standards so there is no immediate concern relative to adverse environmental impacts at these low <br />concentrations. <br />Concentration (ug/L) <br />Total Phosphorus, Chlorophyll -A & Secchi <br />(sia;aw) iyDDaS <br />C H L-A <br />TP <br />Secchi <br />25 <br />20 <br />15 <br />10 <br />5 <br />0 <br />111 1 1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />eeeee <br />CLMP+ data collected for Grass Lake shows that in terms of total phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi disk transparency, <br />the water quality of the lake is equal to or better than minimally impacted (reference) lakes in the ecoregion. <br />Trends <br />The primary purpose of CLMP monitoring is to gather water clarity information for as many lakes as possible over a long <br />period of time to determine if the water clarity trend for the lake over time is increasing, declining or remaining stable. <br />At least 20 data points spread over eight years are required for a basic trend analysis, and more data are often needed <br />to see an actual increasing or declining trend. As part of the CLMP, citizens have monitored Site #201 on Grass Lake for 3 <br />separate years (1975, 2012 and 2013). At this time, there are not enough data for Grass Lak to statistically determine if <br />there is a long-term trend in transparency. Based on the three years of data available, summer transparency ranged <br />between 0.61 meters and 1.5 meters (Figure 4). <br />Grass Lake (02-0113) • August 2014 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />4 <br />