Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 10/06/2014

Home

Councilmember Kuzma referenced the public meetings that were held and questioned how that resident input was incorporated. Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that the input was considered when drafting a response. He noted that the participation in the public meetings dwindled as time went along to the point of zero attendees at the last meeting/open house. Board Member Valentine stated that he would view that as the residents being pleased with their input being heard. Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the main focus for residents was regarding lawful nonconforming uses and the details regarding those matters. He questioned if the EPB believes that the DNR should be establishing rules for the City, above those already existing, in certain areas. City Planner Anderson noted that there is an existing MRCCA Rule and the City has an ordinance in effect presently that substantially complies with the current rule. He advised that the City would gain the transition of some properties from lawful nonconforming uses to lawful conforming uses. Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the DNR has been very cooperative and did incorporate comments throughout the process. Chairperson Stodola questioned if the input of the EPB would even matter. Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that the DNR can amend the rules without the acceptance of the cities but explained that this is the point when a response and input can be submitted to the DNR for consideration. Board Member Valentine stated that he was satisfied with the response drafted by staff and believed that this should simply move forward and confirmed the consensus of the Board. City Planner Anderson advised that this item will go before the Planning Commission on August 7th and then to the City Council the following week in order to meet the August 15 deadline from the DNR. He stated that he would like the input of the Board regarding possible permits that would be needed for vegetation management within the MRCCA. Community Development Director Gladhill explained that currently the City has three different standards for different shoreline areas within the City and stated that after this process the City will attempt to streamline the shoreline requirements. Board Member Lewis questioned if the ultimate intent of the City was to create a uniform set of standards for both river corridors. City Planner Anderson explained that would not necessarily mean a uniform set of standards for both rivers and other water bodies found within the City but to create one shoreline section with subsections for each river and one for other water bodies. He referenced the proposed vegetation permit language and noted that there would be a threshold that would trigger that requirement. Environmental Policy Board / August 4, 2014 Page 4 of 7