My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 10/09/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2014
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 10/09/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:29:10 PM
Creation date
10/9/2014 9:13:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
10/09/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sheet le°m Pnmir�ei <br />• <br />NI% <br />pea <br />Evaluation Summary <br />The safety and mobility results were also plotted as a line graph to show the relative benefit and cost of each <br />project group improvement compared to the ultimate freeway vision of the corridor. The freeway is estimated <br />to cost more than $300,000,000 and is assumed to provide an average Level of Service C (27.5 seconds of <br />delay per vehicle) for the cross street movements. These values serve as the 100 percent benefit and cost <br />targets shown on the graphs. <br />Operation Benefit -vs -Project Cost <br />`et In mil .I- Rar <br />F - 9,h�w.y <br />e. •ems 3,114 <br />3 <br />S. irk <br />"j • 10% up <br />g' tr.. IDaihrg <br />e% $ $34 $1to slip 5zio srsa $ <br />t1 0'Itirt 4DINe, =tt"1-0/Ylllr# <br />• r",. L_v <br />Lower Cast - High 9enolit Approach <br />90% of Operaiianat Benefit <br />for Leathern SO%of Cost <br />Cost 18'. l <br />lin <br />Opimmtilr tltrrn Rlerr7us <br />in r rfirpce Fir�7'f YTyn' <br />2 Tim <br />DM Wd Telle iI r-i <br />• <br />. xan�a <br />siw <br />en <br />y W% 9+ut Tl+elruein Pr arIbri <br />71 -ar <br />54x J - tm i <br />.j Ms inmadairPrh.;in. <br />roar, <br />M ". Lower Cost - High Senora Approach <br />4 <br />Safety Benefit -vs -Project Cast <br />9S% of Safety Benefit <br />i % for Less than SO% of Cost <br />ham% <br />ax 938 SIN SI_; $iw$in <br />Cosi ISM; <br />The S-curves depict the relative benefit compared to the freeway vision of completing each of the project groups <br />for both mobility and safety measures. These graphs show that the greatest benefits come by removing traffic <br />signals compared to at -grade or access management solutions. The information derived from these graphs was <br />used to identify priority projects within the implementation plan. <br />HIGHWAY 10 ACCESS PLANNING STUDY 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.