Laserfiche WebLink
developers will have the opportunity to bring this concern up for discussion at <br />the asseSS~, ent hearings; Mr. Raudio's concern does not affect the adoption of <br />resolution in Case #i.A. <br /> <br />Oounty O3~missioner Natalie Haas - 7007 164th Avenue - Would like to discuss <br />with Council the County Board action lifting the development moratoria. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF AGENDA <br /> <br />Motion by Councilma~ber Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmamber Cox to approve <br />the agenda with the following additions: <br /> <br />Case #1.1 <br /> <br />County Commissioner Haas Regarding County Board Action On <br />The Request To Lift Develo~ent Limitations <br /> <br />Case %19 <br /> <br />Adjustment To Property Valuations <br /> <br />Case #2.D <br /> <br />Discussion Regardin9 The Cost Of Special Investigation <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Council consensus was that Approval of Licenses and <br />Approval of Bills will be addressed as the first order of business. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann ar~ Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />County Commissioner Haas Reg_arding CO~%tv Board Action On_The <br /> R~uest To Lift Develo_~ent Limitations: <br /> <br />County Core, missioner Haas stated that she, A1 Gebhard of Barr Engineering, <br />Assistant County Attorney Colleen Herman and Director of County Envirom~ental <br />Services (~ittee Bob Hutchison are present regarding the Ramsey Landfill. <br />Commissioner Haas stated that the County Enviror~ental Services Co~ittee <br />conducted a hearing regarding Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. 's request <br />that the development limititations be lifted and that they be allowed to mine <br />dirt for cover at the landfill. ~ere were no Ramsey personnel at the hearing <br />but some Ramsey citizens did attend. Waste Management's original request was <br />for 500,000+ c~bic yards; when it came to the Enviror~ental Services Committee, <br />they were prepared to deny the request on the grounds that the amount of dirt <br />would constitute vertical expansion of the landfill and there is no way that <br />the County Board or this Commissioner supports vertical expansion. Before the <br />vote was taken, Mr. Otter of Waste Management amended the request to 247,000 <br />cubic yards; no action was taken that night and the request was referred to the <br />County Health Board. Under State Statutes, the only thing the county is <br />permitted to look at in this situation is if the mining of that dirt would in <br />any way de-enhance Site P in terms of being a potential landfill site. It was <br />determined that the 247,000 cubic yards is enough dirt to cover what is going <br />to be completed at the landfill. The request for 247,000 cubic yards came <br />before the County Board on the morning of August 27. County Commissioner Haas <br />received a letter from Waste Management's attorney to the Metro Council <br />accusing the M~tro Council and County of circ~m/enting the law set forth by <br />legislature concerning negotiations with Elk River, etc. regarding a burning <br /> August 27, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />