My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/14/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/14/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:27:41 PM
Creation date
10/15/2014 9:33:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/14/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ern- OF DOVER . " • :" ' <br />ROADWAY RECONSTRKTION As.sEsivigivr POLICY <br />SECTION I — General Policy Statement <br />I. GENERAL <br />. . <br />• <br />• • <br />The purpose cl this document is to establisk a standard assessmeatpolicy for roadway <br />reconstruction projects within thepityaAndever. <br />Roadway recenstruction projects aro defined as local andfor Munkcipal State Aid City <br />nneets that here an: existing bittiminous suace.and have reached a.level.c;fAistress in' <br />which the City Engineer cleWnnines that the roadway ig in poor condition such that faLt. <br />replacementi warranted. Imptovements co1IsLt3 of a no bituminous suifice, concrete <br />cwl? on(3 gat* -Of required by the City's Concrete Curb and Gutter Policy), additional <br />sterna sewer az needed, stem) sewer replacenent and stied widening i a substandard <br />section. exiSts. <br />• Street and stove. sewer/drainage costs are apportioned to the pronerties benefiting &in <br />. the project; A portioning -the costs of the street and stann sewer construction may be <br />done by divii the cost of the street improvements by the assessable front foot. fp of <br />the beneang peatic.m to determine a cost for liliear front foot or by dividing the casts <br />ofthe streetmovements by the number of ben lots. This is explaine,dunder the <br />• Methods ofAs =mt., <br />The nature ofhe street illiprovements dictate whether or not concrete cud) and gutter is <br />• required (Per he City's concrete curb and guttw policy). The. following is a list of <br />reconstruction ?rejects where concrete curb and gutter is required <br />I: Mdstinz Municipal State Aid Routes (If USA funding is used) <br />-2. Reconsruction Projects <br />- • _Aural. w./ Exislingbitumine-us cab <br />• aural w./ no curb or drainage ditches <br />• _111Urban <br />3.. Eristini, business Areas (Commercial., Retail, fridtstdal) with no Du• rk no <br />dra trag :ditches or misting bituminous curb is in place <br />• . . <br />Roadway reconstruction areas shall be identiged in the City's Capital Tinprovemenatart <br />(CH') at lea_st writ. years prior to construction. The OP is a fluid document hi which <br />roadways will lie iden6fied in the plan, but may be moved to a later date if those.area.s aie <br />not within two year of reconsfoiction and other areas hav-e bee.ti fonnd to be in greater <br />need offepair. • <br />Assesiments fo 7 other improvements (sanitary sewer, water main., etc.) included in a road <br />reconstruction.ixoject shall fgliew the City's standard assessinent policy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.