Laserfiche WebLink
Counc~lmember Cox stated that the City could pick up the costs. <br /> <br />Council unanimously consented to dispense with the reading of the resolution. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to adopt <br />Resolution #85-21 ordering a feasibility report for the street grade problem <br />at the intersection of County Road #5 and Azurite Street NW. (Please refer to <br />resolution file for Resolution #85-21). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox requested that City Attorney Goodrich research whether or <br />not it would be proper for Council to make one motion at the beginning of <br />meetings to dispense with the reading of all resolutions included in the <br />agenda. <br /> <br />f) Request To Redefine The Rum River Scenic River Boundary Adjacent To <br /> River's Bend - <br /> <br />Council unanimously consented to dispense with the reading of the resolution. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Reimann to <br />adopt Resolution #85-22 redefining the Rum River scenic corridor. <br />(Please refer to resolution file for Resolution #85-22). <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Councilmember Schlueter inquired as to how long Staff <br />expects that it will take to hear back from DNR on this request. Mr. Berg <br />replied that he didn't know; that it could take some time. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />g) Request To Support Increased Densities In River's Bend Second Addition - <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio was present. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated as backup to this case that years ago the City could <br />not get the State to buy right-of-way for County Rd. #5 and Hwy. #47; a child <br />had been killed at this location; and he initiated negotiations with Mr. <br />Raudio. As a result of these negotiations we were able to obtain a new turn <br />lane on Cty. Rd. ~5 and Hwy. #47, right-of-way east of Hwy. 47, future bridge <br />crossing right-of-way, provisions for future economic tax base. Councilmember <br />COx stated that all of this was done in good faith and now Mr. Raudio and Mr. <br />Foster are ready to develop and the State has put restraints on development <br />that are far beyond what was agreed to at that time. This proposed resolution <br />would be stating the City's support of the developer being allowed to develop <br />that property at the density rate that would have been allowed had the <br />developer not deeded that property to the City. The developers are only <br />asking for what was agreed to in good faith and nothing more. <br /> <br />Council unanimously consented to dispense with the reading of the resolution. <br /> January 22, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 19 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />