Laserfiche WebLink
away from the populus and in an area able to be sewered at the expense of that <br />area and not the entire city. Councilm~nber Cox noted that contamination <br />would flow to the south. Councilmember Cox stated that the landfill is a <br />bigger threat to contamination. Councilmember Cox stated that the same <br />commissioner says he is not opposed to the airport but he wants to see on <br />paper those figures that the projections were based on; Councilmember Cox <br />noted that those figures are what the Airport Commission is supposed to be <br />providing to City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schlueter stated that the comments Councilmamber COx is <br />referring to were back and forth discussions between Airport Commission <br />members and whether the study addresses these issues or not will be viable <br />discussion even after the study is completed. <br /> <br />Councilm6mber COx referred to a newspaper article included in tonight's <br />meeting material; the article includes a table comparing municipal tax rates <br />and the Airport Commission should receive copies of this article. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Heitman and seconded by Councilrmmmber Sorteberg to adept the <br />following response to the Airport Commission's inquiry: 'Ramsey is committed <br />to a balanced commercial and industrial develol~nent. Hc~ever, without <br />appropriate cost benefit data from the Airport Commission, it is impossible to <br />determine what part, if any, the airport could play in meeting that <br />commitment. It is the responsibility of the Airport Commission to provide <br />that information to City Council for review.' <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, COx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio stated that Mr. Greg Johnson had to leave for another meeting and <br />he can speak for Mr. Johnson regarding Case 92.A. <br /> <br />Case 92: ~ <br /> <br />A) Request For Issuance Of Industrial Revenue Bonds For Food 'N' Fuel <br /> Project: Case Of Mr. Greg_ Johnson: <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that he is not satisfied with State requirements <br />regarding fuel holding tanks; the metal ones are rusting, rupturing and <br />polluting. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that the site and design plan can address this issue and <br />added that the City cannot be more restrictive than the State PCA. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that the IRB is for $300,000 and suggested that it would <br />be beneficial for the City to have some type of a cost breakdown regarding how <br />those figures were arrived at. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that the City has never required a cost breakdown or <br />structure details on the IRB amount being issued because that is the <br />borrower's own business; structure and cost details come into play during the <br />City's Site and Design Plan process. <br /> <br />March 26, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 18 of 26 <br /> <br /> <br />