Laserfiche WebLink
projects for 60 days after the public hearing. That 60 days allows <br />citizens the time to petition to oppose the project. <br /> <br />Jim Holm - Inquired as to what action the citizens can take to have the <br />City policy for assessing sealcoating changed to having those costs taken <br />out of the general fund. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - Stated that there are two petitioning processes that need to <br />be clarified. The 60 day waiting period gives those persons proposed to be <br />assessed for a project the opportunity to decide whether or not they are in <br />favor of or opposed to a project. Petitions can be submitted in favor of <br />or opposed to; the petition signed by more than 50% of the property owners <br />rules. If two petitions are submitted, one in favor of and one opposed to, <br />and both petitions are represented by the same amount of property owners, <br />the one in favor of rules. People can change their mind on a petition up <br />to the time it is submitted to the City Council. When the City <br />A~ministrator receives the petition, he will submit it to the council at <br />their very next meeting, regular or special. In order to change policy, <br />there are a couple of approaches. One way is to talk to representatives <br />and convince them to change city policy. The other approach is initiative <br />which allows citizens to proposed a law or ordinance to be adopted. To do <br />that the citizens circulate a petition to be signed by at least 10% of <br />the number of registered voters at the last general election. That <br />petition submits the initiative to council. Council can adopt that <br />ordinance at that point or put the ordinance to a vote of the entire <br />community. This process is available on any issue. Mr. Hartley noted that <br />he will talk to Mr. Holm following the public hearing regarding zoning <br />concerns in Alpaca Estates. <br /> <br />Michelle Kropske - 7929 142nd Avenue - Inquired if the 50% in the <br />petitioning process refers to occupied parcels. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - Replied that petition numbers are based on number of property <br />owners. <br /> <br />Project ~87-11 - South 1/2 of Hagen's Unplatted Area <br /> <br />There was no citizen input regarding this proposed project area. <br /> <br />Project #87-12 - Ford Brook Estates <br /> <br />There was no citizen input regarding this proposed project area. <br /> <br />Project 987-13 - Greenland Hills <br /> <br />There was no citizen input regarding this proposed project area. <br /> <br />Project 987-14 - Menkveld's Unplatted. North of Pineview E~tates <br /> <br />Barb Graen - 7321 150th Lane ~W - Suggested that this area be tabled for <br />sealcoating until a decision is made on the airport. If the airport <br />project is approved, the hemes across the street will be removed; heavy <br />equipment will ruin the sealcoating. <br /> City Council/March 17, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />