Laserfiche WebLink
'.:.hing~ the City would insist on plus input from the PCA and Met <br />Council. All of ~:hi~.s would n~ed '~.'.) be looked at before_ the Coun~iI <br />decides which direction to go. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley said the Landfill Committee has already addressed some <br />o.F these items. <br /> <br />Councilman Co.,: suggested a Councilmember attend cne of their <br />meetings or have Mr. Hartley relay the Council"s 'Lhoughts. <br /> <br />Sour;cilman Sorteberg felt :i.t: would take a !c,t c:)f time for the <br />Committee to loo1.~: into ar', item like this, unless the Council was <br />just loc, king ~c.,r a s!.uggestic:,n fr'om the Landfill Commit+-ee. <br /> <br />[dr". I.-lar"tley s..u.';ge~.sted the Co,..~.n,::i i ask t'he Land.Fi I I Committee .for a <br />prc, gress report, to be c:onsidered at t:hp_ September ~-~,~:'° ~op-~,. ~./ CoLtncil <br />· , E' e .I.:. i n g. T h e C o t..,. n c i ! a g r- e e d. <br /> <br />Case:, :1:1:10: Consider c:hange or'der for River:s Bend F:'laza sirra? <br />i mprovements~ <br /> <br />r2it¥ I!!:'r',gineer Raatikka explained that the cont. ractor has r'e.quested <br />:in writing '1:o extend 'Lhe comr.)letion date .6or River's Bend F'iaza an <br />add:i, tic:,r'~a]. 70 days. The reason for" this request was delays by the <br />building contractor and delays in obtaining landscaping materials. <br />E~ngineer Raatikka recommended appproval of this request. <br /> <br />Mo'Lior-, by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman F'earson, for <br />al:)prova], c.)~ Clnange Orcler No. I tm_, Construction Contract for <br />Improvement Project ~.187,-3 River's Bend Plaza Site tm~3rovements a'~-z. <br />rec:ommended by t:he City Engineer. <br /> <br />M¢.-,'Lior-', C:al'"ried. Voting yes: Ma'>.'(3r Re:i. mann, Councilmembers Cox, <br />OeLuc:a, F:'c~ar'son and Sorteber'g. Voting no: None. Absent: None, <br /> <br />Case :~:6: Review s'l:atus o'~ the ~s~.'-' ,:3i: Jarv'~s o_r <br /> - - ' '~ eet NW as a haul <br />r'oad. (Continued) <br /> <br />Administrator Hartle'/ read the proposed reso]. _,ti on regarding the <br />· Future alignment o.F !5..-'.r, rd Avenue NW and a railroad crossing near the <br />Nor'thfork Planned Unit Development. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley explained tine railroad maps use the term "Da'./ton <br />._.ro_,=ing but t.h:[s could be changed to inc:lude t:he legal <br />descri pti(3n. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Cox s!.econcied by <br /> .¢_.un~ilman DeLuca~ tn <br />Resolu'Lion 87-220 petitioning Mn/D <br /> <br />Cit'./ Cc, uncil/September i, !987 <br /> P'~ 0 r''~ 9 ~"n f ~ '''~ <br /> <br /> <br />