My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/10/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 02/10/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:21:26 PM
Creation date
2/6/2004 3:13:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/10/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt asked what would happen if a building is not currently in use and the owner <br />wanted to use ii. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated they would have to apply for an SUP and go through site plan <br />review. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon stated in Staff's minds this ordinance <br />allows the owners to reasonably use their land until such time as the City knows what will <br />happen, while at the same time preventing a million and a half dollar expansion when it is not <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />Chairperson Ni~xt argued that if you currently have 0% coverage and wanted 2%, you would have <br />to come to the City for approval. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon noted you would have to in any case in a <br />B-2 District. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald commented the SUP is sort of like a CUP, where you can do it, with <br />conditions. She gave an example ora business wanting to put up a building that was 100% brick. <br />The City may give them permission to use only 50% brick, so the building is not so expensive. <br /> <br />Commissioner 'Johnson asked if the City is affirmatively looking at acquiring property for <br />Highway 10. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon stated they are doing an AUAR of the <br />Highway 10 corridor for mapping, which puts everyone on official notice. This gives the City <br />the ability to apply for funding for land acquisition. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt summarized the letter from the law firm representing Highway 10 businesses, <br />indicated it stated while the ordinance is reasonable, it is not appropriate. The letter objects to <br />25% coverage, .noting it is significantly less than the 35% allowed in B-2, and claims that by <br />limiting use of. the property the City intends to devalue the land. It claims the City Council <br />assured that theresults of the Tinklenberg Group would be made public, and those results should <br />be made available before the City adopts this ordinance. It stated a change in the development <br />rights along the corridor is not in the City's best interest, making note again it is not appropriate. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated the AUAR will be ready for <br />final adoption in December, which is not the report the letter is referring to from the Tinklenberg <br />Group. He stated the City is progressing with the expectation that official mapping will take <br />place in the spring. <br /> <br />Chairperson Ni~t asked what the chances are the ordinance can still pass when needed if they <br />delay it for re-writes. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated there may be a few weeks gap. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/December 4, 2003 <br /> Page 14of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.