Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Bauer believed that the proposed location would be an eyesore and for this reason, <br /> he supported the applicant's original request. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy had a difficult time supporting the variance given the close proximity of <br /> the garage to the bluff line. <br /> Chairperson Levine questioned how the Planning Commission could make this request work. <br /> City Planner Anderson explained if the building were to be rotated, it would be pulled further <br /> away from the bluff line. He stated the side setback would allow for this rotation. <br /> Commissioner Bauer inquired if the applicant would support rotating the garage structure. <br /> Mr. Musenbrock commented to a certain extent, so long as he was not creating a garage that he <br /> could not park his truck in. He expressed concerns with the sight lines this would create from the <br /> river and street. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill suggested the Commission direct staff to discuss <br /> realigning the garage with the applicant. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to table action on this <br /> item requesting the applicant to work with staff on the realignment or rotation of the garage <br /> structure. <br /> Mr. Musenbrock requested action be taken on this matter sooner rather than later. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill anticipated that the request would not be reviewed <br /> until early October. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners Bauer, VanScoy, Maul, and <br /> Nosan. Voting No: None. Absent: None. Abstain: Commissioner Brauer. <br /> 5.02: Consider a Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Maintain Four or More Dogs at <br /> the Property Located at 5520 140th Lane NW; Case of Diane and David Mattson <br /> Presentation <br /> Planning Intern Olson presented the staff report stating the City has received an application from <br /> Diane and David Mattson for a conditional use permit to maintain up to twelve (12) dogs on the <br /> property located at 5520 140t Lane NW. Of the potential twelve (12) dogs allowed on the <br /> property, eight (8) would not belong to the applicant, which City Code Section 10 -52 <br /> (Definitions) would define as a commercial dog kennel. The applicant owns the other four (4) <br /> dogs and their maintenance on the project would represent a private dog kennel. In addition to <br /> Planning Commission /September 4, 2014 <br /> Page 4 of 11 <br />