Laserfiche WebLink
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS <br /> <br />The following criteria will be used 1or proposal evaluation. <br /> <br />/L FOR PROPQSAI_~ RECOMMENDED FROM ALL FUNDING SOURCES:· Project Managers must be <br />accountable ar~ able to complete project objectives.. <br /> <br />Highest pri.~ Will be given Jo' proposals that best .meet the following criteria. The total potential <br /> score' fe, r each criterion is written in parentheses. <br /> <br /> · sIGNIFICANCE - Addresses Significant environmental or natural resource issues. (9) ' <br /> <br /> · UNDERLYING CAUSES - Addresses Underlyin. g 'Causes, stresses ,prevention of <br /> ~ e ,nvironmental degradation and emphasizes wise stewardship, (9) <br /> <br /> · LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS - Acldresses needs identified through .other legislative initiatives, (9) <br /> <br /> · LEVERAGING - Leverages funding (nonstate). (9) <br /> <br /> · CO~)RDINATION-. Dem0nst;ates a coordinated,'multidisciplin'a~ approach. (7) <br /> .· SHORT DURATION- One biennium.(7) " " <br /> <br /> · ' INNOVATION' Innovative approach. (7). · ..... . . <br /> <br /> · INFOR~/IATION'BASE . provides ~'significant useful addition to the.information base. (5) <br /> <br /> · ACCELERATION - Accelerates natural resource, programs,' cloes not'supplant existing <br /> , funding. (5) . -" <br /> <br /> · STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE - (5)' <br /> <br />in add~tion,: Trust Fund expenditures must conform .to the Trust Fund law (M.S; i i 6P.08). <br /> <br /> <br />