My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/04/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/04/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:21:44 AM
Creation date
12/5/2014 9:51:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/04/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.02: Consider Introduction of Ordinance #14-14 Amending City Code Section 117-118 <br />Entitled The COR Amending Minimum Floor Area Ratio and Maximum Parking <br />Requirements in The COR-1 Sub -District <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation of the <br />Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance that allows densities to be more incrementally and <br />organically built as it allows a response to current market conditions and to build incrementally, <br />but not necessitate a major amendment to the Development Plan. Community Development <br />Director Gladhill presented several visuals that explained how Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is defined. <br />He asked whether a policy adjustment is needed to address the market, noting a Purchase <br />Agreement came forward from PSD to the HRA, which sparked this policy discussion. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill asked whether the Council would like additional <br />information and indicated the Planning Commission has asked for the opportunity to review the <br />ordinance a second time after it is introduced by the Council in order to receive policy direction <br />from the Council and ensure a well-rounded understanding of the outcomes of such an amendment. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill described elements of a transit -oriented development. <br />It was noted there had been previous significant amendments related to FAR, as the original <br />Ramsey Town Center FAR of 1.0 was amended to .75. He asked whether this amendment remains <br />consistent with previous funding awards or if the Council would like additional information. <br />With regard to different styles of parking, Councilmember LeTourneau asked if changes in density <br />eliminate the need for a future parking structure. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated it will reduce the likelihood of additional <br />parking ramps but a lot will depend on the projects that come forward. He explained it would <br />allow individual projects to more easily move forward without seeing the requirement for a parking <br />ramp. <br />Gary VanScoy, Planning Commissioner, stated he did oppose this particular amendment because <br />the Code basically states we are trying to come up with a very dense area. He noted that originally, <br />it was 15 units per acre. Planning Commissioner VanScoy stated he thinks the change in FAR <br />from 1.0 to .75 to .65 will result in an impact on this particular project and will actually change the <br />impact of the entire focus of COR-1 by making it easier for more residential yet more difficult to <br />drive commercial. Planning Commissioner VanScoy stated commercial is important in that area <br />and if the Council is considering changing this, he thinks the City should go back and look at the <br />whole thing rather than `nibbling' away at the vision. He stated as a Planning Commissioner, he <br />understands the need to address market demand but is getting uncomfortable with where this is <br />heading. <br />Councilmember Tossey asked if he supported the PSD project with a lower FAR. <br />Planning Commissioner VanScoy stated the City is looking at land use and changing the ordinance <br />to allow that development to happen in a certain way. He felt that PSD had the opportunity to <br />meet a .75 FAR by modifying its project to a certain extent. Planning Commissioner VanScoy <br />noted that at this point, the project as it stands at .65 FAR would fit in another zoning district of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.