My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 11/18/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 11/18/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:28:28 PM
Creation date
12/5/2014 11:12:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
11/18/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 429.031, subd. <br />1(t). <br />See Form 3 (Petition for <br />Local Improvement - more <br />than 35% of property <br />owners). <br />A.G. Op. 396g7 (June 9, <br />1958). <br />City of Brainerd v. Brainerd <br />Investments Partnership, <br />(Minn. 2013). <br />A.G. Op. 387-B-10 (June 29, <br />1954). A.G. Op. 408-C <br />(October 28, 1954). <br />See Form 1 (Petition for <br />Local Improvement - 100% <br />of property owners). <br />Minn. Stat. § 429.035. <br />See Form 4. <br />Minn. Stat. § 429.036. <br />Minn. Stat. § 429.031, subd. <br />1(t). <br />See Form 4-A. <br />See Section II-D-1: Voting <br />requirements for ordering the <br />improvement. <br />1. By petition <br />If the council chooses to proceed with an improvement based on a petition <br />(they are not required to do so) it must have the signatures of the owners of <br />at least 35 percent in frontage of the property bordering the proposed <br />improvements. Computing the 35 percent is not always easy. <br />The Minnesota Attorney General has opined that the 35 percent requirement <br />applies to the entire area petitioning for the local improvement so each <br />specific street need not meet it. <br />The Minnesota Supreme Court finds that the state may be an "owner" for <br />purposes of this 35 percent petition. (The Court finds the statute <br />unambiguous and refuses to consider extrinsic evidence by looking at three <br />Attorney General Opinions. These Opinions suggested that neither the state <br />nor the city is an "owner" for purposes of this 35 percent petition.) <br />If the council relies upon the petition as its basis for proceeding, it cannot <br />make a substantial change in the nature of the improvement from that asked <br />for in the petition. For example, it may not order an improvement for water <br />and sewer when the petition has asked for water alone, or add curb and <br />gutter to a petition for blacktop. <br />In some cases, for example buried utility lines, 100 percent of landowners <br />must petition for an improvement. <br />The council must pass and publish a resolution determining whether the <br />petition is legally sufficient or not. Any person directly affected by the <br />resolution may challenge the council's determination (as to the legal <br />sufficiency of the petition) in district court. The appeal must be made within <br />30 days and include a bond of $250. <br />2. By council <br />The council certainly may act on its own initiative in proposing a local <br />improvement and ordering a feasibility report. As a practical note, an <br />extraordinary majority vote from the council is not necessary to initiate the <br />proceedings. (Later in the process, a four -fifths council vote will be required <br />to pass the resolution ordering an improvement initiated by council). The <br />council must calculate the cost of the improvement or direct staff to do so. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 9/22/2011 <br />Special Assessment Guide Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.