My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 11/18/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 11/18/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:28:28 PM
Creation date
12/5/2014 11:12:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
11/18/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 429.031, subd. <br />1(b). <br />Minn. Stat. § 429.031, subd. <br />1(d). <br />See Form 5. <br />See Section I-B: The special <br />benefit test. <br />B. Feasibility report <br />Whether initiated by petition or by council, Chapter 429 requires that the <br />city engineer, or another person with similar skills, prepare what is <br />commonly called a "feasibility report." (Bond attorneys require a certified <br />copy of a feasibility report before issuing bonds to finance a local <br />improvement.) The feasibility report must cover such factors as whether the <br />project is necessary, the availability of money in the general fund to pay the <br />city's share of the cost, an estimate of that cost, whether the improvement is <br />cost effective, and any other information necessary for council <br />consideration. <br />Note: If someone other than a city employee prepares the report, the law <br />prohibits using a percentage of the costs of the proposed improvement as a <br />basis to pay for the report. The feasibility report must also include the <br />estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Since a reasonable <br />estimate of the total amount to be assessed, and a description of the <br />methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels, <br />must be available at the hearing, it could be part of the commissioned report. <br />The feasibility report is integral to the assessment process. Best practice <br />suggests that the city council pass a resolution receiving the report and <br />provide preliminary notice of the improvement. <br />C. Initial considerations <br />Overall the law requires two public hearings commonly known as an <br />improvement hearing and an assessment hearing; in between these two <br />public hearings councils may order the improvement, decide how to <br />construct the project and tabulate an assessment roll. This Guide outlines <br />some initial considerations, describes the improvement hearing, discusses <br />ordering and constructing the improvement; and subsequently addresses the <br />assessment hearing. <br />1. Determining benefit districts <br />Determining what area benefits from improvement projects, or the area <br />against which the city will levy assessments, is a major policy decision for <br />the city council. The benefit district (or assessment district) varies with the <br />kind of improvement. For some improvements, such as a new water tank, <br />the area benefited might be very large. In levying an assessment to finance <br />the tank's construction, for example, the council might assess the entire area <br />the tank services. The special benefit test still applies. City staff, city <br />engineers, consultants and attorneys may provide the basis for council to <br />determine what area or district to assess for a specific improvement because <br />that area benefits from the improvement. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 9/22/2011 <br />Special Assessment Guide Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.