Laserfiche WebLink
City of Ramsey <br /> <br />~klilS? NOli~', HEN BOULEVARD N.W., RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 · (612) 427-1410 <br /> <br />July 31, 1991 <br /> <br />Mr. Jack Mill~ <br />Juniper Ridge Partnership <br />4140 Terrace Lane <br />Minnetonka, MN 55343 <br /> <br />RE: Propo~d Revision of River Bluffs Subdivision Preliminary Plat <br />Dear Mr. Miller: <br /> <br />Subsequent to the May 7, 1991 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which the <br />Commission ~¢ornmended denial of a request for a revision to the preliminary plat of the above <br />mentioned sub, division, you met with City Staff to consider alternative plans. As a result of those <br />discussions, two alternative sketches were considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission at <br />the special mieetir~g held on June 16, 1991. At the June 16, 199] meeting, the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission had recommended that plan entitled "Exhibit A" which consists of a colored <br />pencil drawing prepared by my office which was superimposed on a blue-line base prepared by <br />McCombs, Frank, Roos Associates, Inc. be advanced for public hearing and further consideration. <br />1 hereby offer'the following comments on the aforementioned revised plan entitled Exhibit "A": <br /> <br />~) <br /> <br />Zoning. The subject land parcel is zoned P.U.D. and as such, typical zoning restrictions <br />pertaining :to lot sizes, widths, setbacks, etc. are subject to the discretion of the Planning <br />and Z0nin~} Commission. The adjacent land use to the North represents residential R-IR <br />Rural Residential District and is developed as Stanhope River Hills subdivision. The <br />subdivision to the West is similarly zoned R-I R Rural and is developed as residential <br />property by Rum Acres Estates subdivision. Lot sizes in the adjacent subdivisions range <br />from approximately .9 acres in Rum River Estates to 2 acres in Stanhope River Hills. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />Lots. The proposed plan creates a total of 25 lots on the approximate 60 acre parcel. <br />Subtracting the acreage of Outlot B and the acreage required for dedicated street rights-of- <br />way, the average lot size would be approximately 1.25 acres. Care should be taken to <br />insure that adequate lot width exists at the specified setback. Both of these minimums <br />should be 'specified by the Planning and Zoning Commission as this is a P.U.D. I would <br />sugge~;t a forty foot setback and a minimum width at this setback of one hundred feet. It <br />should also be noted that six river lots have frontages of 150 feet, which is ten feet less <br />than the minimum lot frontage allowed on previously approved P.U.D.'s. This restriction <br />was.u!ilized primarily to facilitate the future split of the lots when water and sewerbecomes <br />available. The Planning and Zoning Commission should determine whether such a future <br />tot split is probable in the case of this subdivision. Considering the fact that the river lots <br />will tend to be i~iuh value properties, it is my opinion that such a split would not be likeh'. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />Soils. The proposed subdix'ision is intended to be served by on-site soil :~bsorbtion <br />svsten,,s. All sofis comained ~'ithin the bMidab}e portion; of ~he subdivision. ~ha~ is <br />excluding t~e pomon Oeiox~ ~ne bluff line. is classified by the Soil Conservation Scrx'ice as <br />Class 1 soils suil:ibie for on-site systems. However. the soil survey indicates a histosoi in <br /> <br />"7 <br /> <br /> <br />