Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Gamec stated he believes this is a mixed concept that could work out if they plan for the <br />right things. Councilmember Kurak brought up a good concern about the association. The <br />developer should know there may be discussion about the raingardens at the final plat approval. <br /> <br />Tom Lincoln, representative of URS, indicated he has been working with Ramsey Town Center <br />LLC and D.H. Horton. They will work with staff on a plan for the rain gardens. He explained <br />the infiltration portion would not be heavily landscaped, the rain gardens would be the more <br />heavily landscaped area. He has seen hostas and purple coneflower type planting materials used. <br />They will work with staff to further define this to come up with a landscape plan. Their intent is <br />to use this best management practice, which is used in many places now. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman requested a review of the park dedication fees. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon explained the City is in active <br />negotiations with Ramsey Town Center LLC in regards to park dedication fees and there should <br />be a resolution by mid March in regards to the contribution they would provide. There may not <br />be a park dedication fee owed due to the amount of improvements the developer is doing. If that <br />does not happen the City would charge the normal park dedication fees. At the Council work <br />session on March lst there will be a more detailed update available. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to adopt Resolution #04- <br />02-058 approving the preliminary plat of Ramsey Town Center 2nd Addition subject to <br />compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated January 30, 2004, Revised February 20, 2004, <br />approval of the preliminary site plan, and approval of amendments to the Town Center Zoning <br />Code to allow for driveways less than 25 feet for residential units that have a front door facing a <br />public street and contain rear loaded garages and to allow for a 25-foot setback for back-to-back <br />townhome units. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired about the indication that moving the trail might shift the whole <br />plat to the west. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained as part of every development that goes in <br />adjacent to a county road the City requires a trail to be constructed. Generally the trail is required <br />on the developer's property or a combination of right-of-way and developer property. This <br />whole section of Ramsey Boulevard will be reconstructed. When the Ramsey Boulevard <br />improvements were beginning to be worked through it was intended the trail be placed wholly <br />within the right-of-way. However, the right-of-way was not wide enough and it needed to be <br />shifted to allow at least an eight-foot boulevard between the curb and the ten-foot walkway. He <br />explained originally there would have been a 14-foot offset between the right-of-way and the <br />building pads, and if a ten-foot walk was put in there would only be four feet. A compromise <br />was made that determined four feet would be county right-of-way and six feet would be on the <br />developer's property. Therefore, a six-foot trail easement was needed along the eastern portion <br />of this plat or west of the Ramsey Boulevard right-of-way, and the developer would be <br />responsible for that. There will be ten feet of separation between the trail and the front stoop of <br />the building. One option to solve the problem would be that the whole plat would shift over if <br /> <br />City Council/February 24, 2004 <br /> Page 16 of 31 <br /> <br /> <br />