Laserfiche WebLink
was taken and only two people were supportive of a trail. After the discussions the Park and <br />Trail Committee approved not to have the trail, and the Council supported them. One of the last <br />things one of the Councilmembers asked was if they would prefer a sidewalk in front of their <br />house instead of the trail. The person talking to the Council was her husband, and he was not <br />being a spokesman, he was being an individual. She suggested this money be put into a park <br />rather than a trail or sidewalk, as there are a lot of parks that need work. She does not feel it is a <br />good expense to put the sidewalk there. She understands these are dedicated funds from the <br />developer of the new development, but it would be better served to put the money into the parks. <br />She does not think it will serve anyone on 145th Avenue to have their landscaping and sprinkling <br />systems dug tip for the purpose of a sidewalk unless there is some rationale that they will be <br />doing this throughout the City to existing neighborhoods. She stated the neighbors in this area <br />have car pools and nobody walks to school. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Kapler indicated this area is within the two-mile walking radius. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook stated he believes one of the reasons they discussed the sidewalk or the <br />original trail was the connection to the new neighborhood and the elementary school. It is late to <br />now be discussing this, as they are at the point of construction. The sidewalk is not just for the <br />houses in their neighborhood, but for the community, These neighbors may carpool, but the <br />people in the new subdivision might not. Also, with regards to how the money is spent, this is <br />trail funding fi:om the developer and can only be spent on trails; the sidewalk is replacing trail <br />that was originally in the plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak asked if the sidewalk will be put in the easement. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied the sidewalk will be within the right-of-way and <br />there is also a ten-foot drainage easement along the northerly boundary of the right-of-way. The <br />only time they may run into the easement is if there is a driveway that needs to be matched. All <br />of the sidewalk will be constructed in concrete and there will be a new concrete apron put on <br />each driveway that is passed by. If there is too steep of a slope they may have to go into the <br />drainage and utility easement, however, everything will be re-sodded and re-seeded, and <br />sprinklers will be replaced. <br /> <br />Greg Stallick, 6001 145th Lane, stated he was working from home the Tuesday or Wednesday <br />before Thanksgiving and had the survey crew in his front yard. He asked what they were <br />surveying and they said it was for the sidewalk. He called Julie Horn and she contacted <br />Cotincilmember Strommen and went to City Hall. He talked to Patrick on December 1st and <br />expressed his concern about the sidewalk and was told everyone along the north side of 145th <br />were adamant about the trail. He stated he does not think that many people were adamant, only <br />two people may have said yes to a path. If he had the option of a path going through the buffer <br />zone behind his yard and the development or the sidewalk in his front yard, he would choose the <br />walking path. He thinks a walking path would better serve the purpose than going through the <br />fi'ont yards of the people on 145th Lane. Their neighborhood only has 21 houses and does not <br />have a feeder road onto Sunwood Drive. He would like this issue revisited. He understands the <br />Council and Park and Recreation Board want something to connect the trail system, but he would <br /> <br />City Council/February 24, 2004 <br /> Page 23 of 31 <br /> <br /> <br />