My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08/15/84
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Airport Commission
>
Minutes
>
1984
>
08/15/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 9:15:45 AM
Creation date
2/23/2004 3:12:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Airport Commission
Document Date
08/15/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LETTER. S ~A~D .i ~OMMUN I CAT ION S <br />Commission n~ted the. following: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />Letter from Airport Commission Chairman Jack Ippel dated August <br />1, 1984 to Mr. James Murray regarding radio tower request by <br />FM t08. <br /> <br />2) Letter from Mayor Thomas Gamec dated August 1, 1984 to Mr. James <br /> Murray regarding radio tower request by FM 108. <br /> <br />COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: ,prOgress Report From Consultants On' Airport Master ~P!~n Study: <br /> <br />Larry Koshak stated that the Airport Commission will be conducting <br />the second public meeting on Wednesday, August 22, 1984. Topics <br />for discussion at that meeting will be the preliminary Airport <br />Layout Plan, envirorrmental and land acquisition issues. Notice <br />of the public meeting has been published in the Ramsey Newsletter <br />and Anoka County Union. <br /> <br />Merland Otto~distributed copies of the preliminary layout plan <br />(Attachmeht I to these minutes) and Historic and ForeCast Based <br />Aircraft Study (Attachment II to these minutes) and proceeded to <br />review these~items with the Commission. <br /> <br />Case #2: ~UPd'ate On Meeting With State D'eparltm'ent' Of' AeronaUtics: <br /> <br />Mr. Otto Stated that the State is adimant about going with a 3300' <br />runway sy~tem~ they don't want to create the same problems being <br />experienced With the Crystal airport. The State is concerned with <br />the cost ~f the Gateway North project and it's zoning problems. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto Stated that Metro Council's reaction to Gateway North <br />is a 'wait aBd see' type of thing. Mr. Otto stated that Ramsey <br />will needlst~ong support from Metro Council in order for this <br />project to go through. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto stated that FAA did not have any strong concernsi they <br />did reiterate that they require a 1000' clear zone'and will <br />participate 'in acquisition~costs within that 1000~ only; the <br />State is more restrictive and requires an additional 1000' of <br />clear zone and most of the acquisition costs will be 'in that <br />second 1000' FAA will participate to the maximum they can <br />depending~on what funds are available at the time and they will <br />only commit after the community has committed. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto ~istZibuted copies of Gateway North preliminary cost <br />estimate (Attachment II1 to these minUtes) and reVieWed it with <br />the Commission~ <br /> <br />Mr~ Otto ~tated that in order for Gateway North to qualify for <br />Federal fUnd%ng, GateWay must be accePted into the NASP (National <br />Aviation. System Plan). Criteria for accePtance 'is: <br /> <br />August 15, 1984 <br />P~ge 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.