Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> <br />Th~ facility must be more than 30 minutes average ground <br />ti~el.away from another NASP operation; Gateway North is <br />24 minutes away from Anoka County Airport. <br /> <br />Facility must be accepted in either regional or State <br />airport plan. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />FaCility forecasted to have 10 based aircraft within 5 <br />years. <br /> <br /> 4. Eligible sponsor willing to undertake ownership and <br /> de~elopment of airport. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto stated that if a facility is less than 30 minutes away <br />from another~NASP operation, it may qualify as a reliever airport <br />facilitY.l Criteria for acceptance as a reliever is 50 based <br />aircraft With 25,000 annual itinerant operations or 35,000 annual <br />operations within two years after project completion~ <br /> <br />Mr. Ott° Stated that with strong support from Metro Council and <br />Mn/DoT, GateWay North stands a good chance of obtaining Federal <br />funding. <br /> <br />Commissioner~ Soderholm and Greenberg brought up for discussion <br />the fact~ that Mn/DoT's original reaction, to the possibility of <br />Gateway N~rth becoming a limited facility was favorable and now <br />they seem!to, only want to consider a full scalee 3300' runway <br />system. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto Stated that the cost factor to improve Gateway North <br />is so great that there is no way the State will participate <br />on a 1/3 ~ 2/3 basis without some Federal participation also; <br />the State, just does not have enough funds to participate in a <br />full scale project like this. <br /> <br />Commissio~er-Greenberg suggested that perhaps the business <br />communityicoUld get involved in the projeCt as a way to offset <br />the cost to the community. <br /> <br />Motion by, Chairman lppel to submit to Metro Council, FAA and <br />Mn/DoT, the Gateway North preliminary Airport Layout Plan, <br />Historic and~Forecast Based Aircraft Data and Preliminary Cost <br />Estimate in order to make sure that all is in comPliance with <br />minimum requ~rements~ to proceed with the Airport Master Plan; <br />and to set up a meeting with Mark Ryan, staff person at Metro <br />Council in charge of airport planning. <br /> <br />Further DiscUssion~ Commissioners Sieber and Donovan suggested <br />that it would be more appropriate to submit these 'preliminary <br />plans and~eStimates to the various agencies after the public <br />meeting ob August 22~ 1984~ Mr. Koshak agreed on the bmsis that <br />the public cO~ents taken on August 22, 1984 could reSult in <br />changes being made to the preliminary Airport Layout Plan. <br /> <br />Motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />AP/August 15, 1984 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />