My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/25/84
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Airport Commission
>
Minutes
>
1984
>
01/25/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 9:12:44 AM
Creation date
2/23/2004 3:20:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Airport Commission - Special
Document Date
01/25/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E. Provides for certification by engineer. <br /> <br />F. provides assurances. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sieber pointed out that the contract refers to the City of Ramsey <br />as being the airport owner and that the second paragraph on page 1 implies <br />improvements are intended to be made at Gateway North, which is not the case; <br />this study is to determine whether or not upgrading Gateway North is feasible. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is to replace all references in the contract to 'owner' <br />with 'spoNsor' <br /> <br />Commission consensus is to reword the first line of the s~cond paragraph on <br />page 1 as follows: 'Whereas, the sponsor proposes to make improvements . . .'. <br /> <br />Mr. Koshak noted the following corrections in the last paragraph on~.page 1: <br /> <br />a. Third Line - Change 'lump sum payment' to 'lump sum cost' <br /> <br />b. Fourth Line - Change '$35,300' to '$36,800'. <br /> <br /> c. Sixth Line - Change $5,100' to '$3,600' <br /> <br />Mr. Otto referred to Page 2, second paragraph and noted that Mn/DoT does not <br />want to deal with numerous reimbursement requests from the City; Mn/Dot is <br />agreeable to 4 or 5 reimbursement requests from the City for the entire <br />project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Siebert inquired if there were any provisions in the contract <br />for payment holdback. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto and Mr. Koshak replied that there are not any such provisions; the <br />work must be done in conformance with the work statement and payment is <br />required for work done to date. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto referred to Page 3, third paragraph, and suggested wording be <br />included to the effect that Approval of Phase I be obtained prior to <br />entering Phase II. The Commission agreed. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is to make the following change to the third paragraph <br />fifth line~, Page 3: 'to proceed has been given in writing by the sponsor and <br />by'. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is to make the following change to the last paragraph <br />on Page 4: Delete all wording after the phrase 'and other similar items'. <br /> <br />Chairman Ippel referred to the sign-off page and requested that Mr. Koshak <br />determine whether or not it will be necessary for the entire Council to <br />sign the contract. <br /> <br />The Commission then reviewed Exhibit A of the contract. <br /> <br />No major comments were made by the Commission other than that Item 2.F <br />refers to a survey of active pilots in the area and Commissioner Soderholm <br />volunteered to compiling such a list. <br /> <br />Sp AP/January 25, 1984 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.