My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/08/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/08/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:56:16 PM
Creation date
1/15/2015 12:26:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/08/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Strategies to I mprove Communities <br />A Mix of Survey and Administrative Data in a Community <br />Scorecard <br />Littleton, Colorado <br />The Qty of Littleton, Colorado produces an annual <br />community scorecard <br />( http://www.littletongov.orci/ modules/ showdocume <br />nt.aspx ?documented= 3278 )that presents data <br />related to its City Council's goals. I n the 2013 -2014 <br />report, performance data were presented in the <br />following strategic areas: <br />Assure a fi nancially -sound city government <br />Provide a safe community to live, work and play <br />Develop and maintain the public infrastructure <br />Preserve and cultivate a quality community <br />Pursue a balanced and sustainable local <br />economy <br />Support environmental sustainability <br />Foster community involvement, communication <br />and trust <br />The report not only has hard data about sprinkler <br />system installs, budget allocations, number of <br />exhibits, visitors and milestraveled, but it also has <br />resident perspectives about service quality and <br />strategic direction directly from its citizen survey. <br />Not only doesthe report include resultsof thesurvey <br />but it shows how those results compare to results <br />asked of residents in comparison communities. <br />COMMUNITY <br />SCORECARD <br />and Annual Report <br />Littleton 2013/2014 <br />Program Evaluation <br />Once you have decided to take action to improve <br />your community, it is important to evaluatethe <br />resultsof your efforts. Strong governing requires <br />both experimentation and useof evaluation data. <br />Strategies to Promote Successful Use of <br />Evaluation <br />Identify program goals, objectives, and <br />performance measureswell in advanceof <br />implementing their evaluation <br />Regularly track service activities and outcomes <br />Systematically measure service outputs (how <br />many residents attended council meetings last <br />year ?) and outcomes (how much did their <br />knowledge of community issues increase ?) <br />Regularly communicate evaluation resultsto <br />staff, residents, and other stakeholders <br />Useevaluation datato improveservices <br />Encourage organizational learning <br />Evaluations can besmall or large, often based on the <br />price tag of the new initiative. I n the Educate section <br />of this playbook, the reimaging campaign <br />undertaken by Greeley, Colorado was presented. <br />Although Greeley has only been working on this new <br />branding initiative a short time, government staff <br />wanted to assess its "penetration" at an early stage, <br />so they launched a short, web -based survey to <br />community stakeholders followed by a survey of <br />residentsof Greeley and residentsin three of the <br />state's largest cities — Denver, Fort Col I n and <br />Colorado Springs. <br />© 2014, National Research Center, Inc. Page 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.