Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br />M~. !4cCaslin - 6310 164th Lane - My understanding is that the concensus in <br />Ramsey wasionei single family dwelling/lot. If that is true, why is this PUD <br />being discusse~? <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec - Ramsey has been looking at high density housing for many years. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle -~ Ramsey's zoning map has 3 established densities. A developer <br />can buy that land and develop at that density. <br /> <br />Brenda Bauerkemper - Inquired as to opinion of the other Councilmembers regarding <br />this propoSedldensity. <br /> <br />Mayor GameC -You will see how they feel when they vote on the project. <br /> <br />Councilmem~er Sorteberg - This is a public hea~ing - Council is not here to <br />talk. It's p~rpose is fo~ the public to get information from the developer. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> ! <br />,I <br /> <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />John Lichter In our meetings with the developer we talked about restrictive <br />convenanae~--iwhen will that be developed in black and white? <br /> ? <br /> <br />Mr. Carson~- ~omeowners agreements and restrictive covenance will be submitted <br />prior t° f~na~ plat approval. <br /> <br />Mr. Good~ich - There have been two public hearings -- one' With Planning and <br />Zoning an~ on~ with Council. Staff did request that Council authorize pre~ <br />paration o~ a,resolution for Council adoption at their meeting of January 24, <br />1984. T~a~ resolution will consist of Council granting concept approval only. <br />It does ~othi~g toward gaining preliminary approval, but it gives the developer <br />a good feelin~ to spend money on all the items required for preliminary <br />approval. Th~se items are then brought to the City for preliminary plan <br />approvall. If'the preliminary plan is adopted the developer fulfills a couple <br />more requirements and comes back to Council for final plan approval. If the <br />final plan is.approved, the City initiates a zoning change to PUD. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson - If we are getting concept approval only -- why wait two Weeks? <br />Can't we ~et ~oncept approval tonight and preliminary approval in two weeks? <br /> <br />Mr. G~odrich ~ Council would prefer to adopt a findings and a resolution. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle - The covenance and exhibits presented to P & Z should be <br />included in the resolution. <br /> <br />Duane Erl£enl- On the point of density, is that something that has just been <br />proposed by the developer and now it's up to the Zoning Commission to approve <br />or disapprove? <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich , Density is established by zoning ordinances. Density was <br />established ih 1978 and the density window for this particular area is <br />5-15 units/acre. <br /> <br />,I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec - Compliments Mr. Carson and residents of Flintwood I and City <br />Building ~ffi¢ial for working together and understanding each other's situation. <br /> <br />Paul sitz.- 6521 154th Lane - Have a problem with Mayor's attitude regarding <br />meetings between developer and residents of Flintwood I. It seems as Council <br />is giving~up~it's responsibility to look out for the best interest of all <br />citizens Of ~he City. <br /> <br />C/January 10, 1984 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />