Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Core'miSSion Action: 7our act:oz v. Jt] h,e to make a recommenclation to the <br />Citv:C0~nc'il on what vo'ar feelin6~, are on th:s matter based on the engineer's <br />inpu~ as well as x'our personal knowledge of the matter. The followin~ <br />]~,roposedi motion is ?,ereby submitted for your consideration: <br /> <br /> rgcommend amend~n6 Ordinance 170.039D bx' eliminating Subparagraph <br /> $ ~hich requires V.A. and F'.H.A. approval of all new plats. <br /> <br /> Moti&n carried. Voting .~'es ~ Voting no <br />CASE $7: PRELIM[NARY APPROVAL AND PROPOSED REZONING FOR FLINTWOOD <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />HILLS P~ANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; CASE OF MR. NORM HOLM: <br /> <br />Inasmuch as I am scheduled out for a seminar on February 3, 1984, I am <br />writing this case early and have not yet received all the information required <br />by 0rdifiance. However, based on discussions with both the developer and <br />City Engineer, it appears that the information that will be attached under <br />sepaFat~ cover will comply with the requirements of the P.U.D. ordinance. <br />If there :are any deficiencies, they will be spelled out in the Engineer's report <br />which will also be included. <br /> <br />Acc°rdi~gly, Exhibit "A", under separate cover, contains the following: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> a/) ~opy of P.U.D. ordinance <br />· l~) ~11 information required by ordinance <br /> ¢) C~fty Engineer's report <br /> <br />Not~: :.The City Attorney will be reviewing this information prior to the <br />meeting! and his findings will be available at the meeting. <br /> <br />I ~on~ Based on this information, your action should be to <br /> ~ approval or denial of the Pl~ued Unit Development and <br /> the ~ ~ ' <br /> ~nec~ssa~ ~ezonmg. The following proposed motions are hereby submitted <br /> fo~ ~rom~ consideration: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Motion by and seconded by to recommend <br />&ppr~ val/denial of the proposed Planned Unit Development of Flintwood <br />fiia . <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes . Voting no <br />'and~ <br /> <br />Motion by and seconded by to recommend <br />apprOval/denial of the rezoning of the following described property to <br />a planned Unit Development: <br /> <br />That part of the south half of the Southwest Quarter <br />and of Government Lot 3, Section ZS, Township 3Z, <br />Range ZS, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly <br />of the plat of Flintwood Hills and lying westerly of <br />the centerline of State Highway ~47 as now laid out <br /> <br /> <br />