Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />~-e,:~ommer, d the- ch~nzes tha~ you '~'ish to sec. and direct the - <br />proceed ~to prelimir~ary plat contingent upon compliance wit~ the City Code <br />and direction of the P~.nnmg and Zoning Co~mission. <br /> <br />If you conc~ ~'ith the ~bove, then the following proposed motion a'ould <br />be :in order: <br /> <br /> Moti&n by and seconded by to approve the sketch <br /> Plan ~presented by Mr. Brad Swenson, representin~ Mr. Josep~ Sent3mz, <br /> ~ont!n~ent upon the foliewmg: <br /> <br /> 1) Changes to the plat you max d~ect <br /> Compliance with City Code <br /> 3) Payment of $500.00 es~ow depoMt <br /> <br /> Moti~On ca~ied. Voting yes Voting no <br /> <br />If~ou ~ant ~. Swenson to ret~ with the sketch plan, then you should <br />t~b[e thls item ~til the next ~g~ meeting. <br /> <br /> PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE- MOBILE HOME ORDINANCE.' <br />CASE <br /> <br /> The City Council, at their regular meeting on December 20, 1983, passed <br /> a ~moti~n requesting City Staff to amend the mobile home section of the <br /> zo.n~ng ~Ordinance to eliminate the provisions for allowing mobile homes on <br /> a t~m~ basis. The lnnguage for deleting that section is included in <br /> the,pUblic hearing notice which is contained in enclosure <br /> <br /> ~m~ .Action: Your action will be to recommend/not recommend <br /> this ordinance. The following proposed motion is hereby submitted <br /> f0r~youl· consideration: - L ~ <br /> <br /> Motion by ' \)~- ~ and seconded by ~~ .to recommend/not <br /> recommend amending the mobile home section of the zoning ordinance <br /> by: lieleting Paragraphs four (4) and five (5) of Section I?0.0ZZ "Mobile <br />I 'Home Location". <br /> .Mo~ion carried. Voting yes . Voting no . <br /> <br /> CASE ~6m ~................~ AMEN._DMENT. TO .THE~ SUBDIVISION CODE, CHAPTER 170.039D, <br /> ~[]~P____~RAGRAPH 8 ~l.A. AND F.H.A. PLAT APPROVAL': <br /> <br />I The d~velopers of the Flintwood Hills P.U.D. requested the City Council <br /> consider deleting the above referenced section of the City Code because, <br /> in ,~thei~ opinion, it was an added project cost that was not necessary anymore <br />I be~aus~ of recent changes in the financial field. <br /> Accordingly, the Council referred this back to you for your recommendations. <br /> <br /> (DZ-f) contains of the section of ordinance in <br /> EnClos~re <br /> copy <br /> question <br /> as~ we!l as a report from the City Engineer's office as to his findings in <br /> researching this matter. <br /> <br /> <br />