02/07/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Corr, mi~ion Action' ':'our action ~-ill be to reco~.end ar, r_.ro,'al'dJ~ap;,roval from the f]oodway would be to allow for additiona, development alon$ the f]um River providfng Ram~e~' with a higher tax base. One negative impact ~'ould be that added devempment alon6 the Rum River could decreas[ the nat'~a] scenic beauty of the river. However, a~v development womd be re[u]r~ied ky t~e Scenic ~dJnance. ~e follou'in~ proposed motion is hereby submftted for %o~ consideration: ~ Council a~~ution ~S4- rede DNR to delete ~pproximately ten a~es of the Rau~ property from the floodxYay. Motion c~ied. Voting yes . Voting no . Inasmuch as deleting this property from the flood plain would change the zon~ng~ ghe following action is also necessary: '~ ap~/dicapprcval of the .~q~ [~ ~zo~ [he propez-ty ~A~::~}O~ FOR S~H PLAN ~W F~R LOT Z, BL~K 1, ~? ~m~US~L PA~K ~-SUBD~ON, CA~ OF MR. BRAD~Y ~.~ Bradley Swens~, repre~nting ~. Joe Sent~z, will be available at the ~ ' me~tmg to dis~s ~ith you a propo~d re~u~ivision of ~t Z, Block l,~ ~ey 67 ~d~tfi~ P~k. His propo~l is to divide the lot into fo~ ~ly~ized lots of ]~t le~ th~ ~e a~e each with a s~eet that wo~d de~dend at Lot 1, Block 1. A~ the ~inf~ation that the o~in~ee wo~d req~e as a p~ of the sketch pl~ ~ not been provided. ~is is p~ly a reset of my not being able to ~d the time with ~. Swenson to e~lain the o~in~ee. However, what h~s~ presented is as much as we have ~q~ed of simple plats of this nat~e tn the past. ~e fo~owin~ items ~e ~cluded ~ enelos~e ~Z~) f~ yo~ consideration in th~ matter: a) Applicant's application b) Area loc~tion map ~) Sketch of the proposed plat ~m~ A~i~; ~asmuch as the applicant has not completed all the reqU~ents of the ordin~ce, you may want him to ret~ with the requ~ed inf~ion at yo~ next reg~ meeting ~d withhold sketch pl~ approval ~tfl that time. However, in view of the simplicity of the plat, it would be-o~ recommendation that you accept the sketch ~l~n as received~