03/06/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MotiOn by and seconded by to recommend adopting/ ~/amending the findings of fact of Ms. Darlene Dickman for a condi[ional use permit to operate a counseling service by appointment only a,'t her residence located at~../;-J8451 - 66th Circle NW. Motion carried. Voting yes -o~,~._.~ .... . Voting no . -and- :Motion by,'~?-J-'4'r~and seconded by to recommend d~sapproval of Ms. Darlene Dickman's request for a conditional use permit :to o~erate a counseling service for out-patients at her residence located (~'# a't 84~1 - 166th Circle NW. .~" --- ~1 '-g/~-' MotiOn c~ied. _Votin yes . ~ .~ . Voting no Not~: If yo~ action is to recommend approval, then it should be contingent upon: Ms, Dickman entering into a conditional use permit a~eement with the City~ See enclos~e (DZ-b) for this a~eement. CASE ~3: R~V~T TO SUBDUE BY ME~S AND BOUNDS; CASE OF MR. GARY M~. O~ Dovel of 57~1 - 164th Lane NW is ~equesting authorization to subdivide by metes ~d bo~ds a p~cel of land in the north half of Section 8 whick will eventually be a Z0 acre p~cel and would comply with the requirements of the ordinance for property subdivisions by metes and bo~ds. However, Mr. Dovel is p~chasinE outright only ten acres and he will be p~ehas~ the other ten acres on a contract for deed. While Mr. Dovel seems sincere,l, there could conceivably be a ten acre p~cel of landlocked p~operty if Mr. ,Dovel fails to complete the p~chase of the southerly ten a~es. ~efo~e, we feel that in consideration fo= this vari~ce, a development a~eem~nt requirina Mr. Dovel to plat his property and p~ovide access to the ~sou~herly ten a~es would be appropriate if he fails to complete the p~chase of the southerly ten ac~es. An area location map and a proposed development agreement are included as enclosure (DZ-c) for your consideration in this matter. COm, mi~Ssion Action: The following proposed motion is hereby submitted for your consideration: ot on by, econded by to recommend approval of a~ suhdi,dision o{ ten acres in the NE¼ of the NW~A of Section 8, Township 3Z, Range 25, City of Ramsey~ Anoka County, Minnesota, contingent upon the iapplicant entering into a development agreement with the City of Ramsey. Motion carried. Voting yes . Voting no .