My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/06/84
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1984
>
03/06/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:50:23 PM
Creation date
2/24/2004 2:26:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
03/06/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka t~en reviewed his letter of February 7, 1984 regarding the same <br />subject w!~h ~e Commission. This letter brought up the following points <br />that might ~an~ to be addressed: structure height, sidewalks and bike ways, <br />traffic signals, recreation areas such as tot lots. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson Sta~ed that a majority reaction from Flintwood I residents is that <br />they do not waht tot lots adjacent to their property. Consensus is that the <br />two parks:planned adjacent to the PUD are sufficient. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg stated that it would not be unreasonable to consider the additional <br />right-of-way gSven by the developer for the MSA street as a basis for granting <br />a variance to~he 1.3 acres deficiency in complying with park dedication/ <br />open space requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson also pointed out that the developer is giving up 3 acres for an <br />easement O~ Hwy. 47. <br /> <br />Commissioner ZSmmerman inquired as to the developer's reason for revising <br />the plan to cluster housing. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson replied that market research showed that the location is too far <br />from the MetrQ/area to do a rapid development of 4's and 8's. As a result, <br />the to~al density has decreased from 327 to 182. Residents of Flintwood I <br />feel this plan~is much more superior to the previous plan. <br /> <br />Chairman PeterSon referred to Item #5 of Mr. Raatikka's letter of February 3, <br />1984 and i~quired if a variance can be granted to allow for 60' wide streets <br />instead of 66'.. <br /> <br />Mr. Raati~a replied that the City can set the standards for a PUD and 60' <br />is adequate. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg state~ that if the PUD is approved with 60' wide streets, no variance <br />is require~, iIf a PUD is approved, then everything in that PUD is approved <br />and requires n~ variance except for park fee dedication. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson reiterated his concern for the number of driveways coming <br />out onto an MSA Street. <br /> <br />Mr. CarsOn. explained that there will be one driveway for every four units <br />and the MSA street is wide enough to allow for an acceleration lane. <br /> <br />Mr. Rick Foster stated that 'the total number of driveways coming onto the MSA <br />Street (DySposium) would be 14, that turn-arounds are provided and people will <br />not be backing onto the street. <br /> <br />Mr. Rekuok~ - Inquired if there is a code that will be enforced to keep those <br />common driveways clear. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson reDlied that the common driveways must be kept open at all times; <br />that there are separate driveways to each unit coming off the common driVeway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer noted that there is a section in the restrictive covenance <br />regarding ingress/egress. <br /> <br />Mr. RekuCki -[Inquired as to his options, as a landlowner, in view of what is <br />happening ~eXt to his property? <br /> <br />p & Z/February 7, 1984 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.