Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Motion a&r~ie~, voting Yes; Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Reimann, <br />$chluete~' ~n~ ivan Wagner. Voting No ~ None. <br /> <br />Case #17~i . .Ft.$ntwood Hills Plat Second Addition (Planned Unit Development) <br /> ~. (.Ak .Preliminary Appr0val And Rezonin~ For Flintwood Hills Plat <br /> i, . 9ond AdditionB.. Receiving Feasibility port For <br /> '~ La.~er.al Sanitar~ Sewer~ Storm Sewer~ Watermain And Street <br /> C0*~struction For Flintwood Hills Plat Second Addition): <br /> <br />a) Prel.4alina~y Approval and Rezoning For Flintwood Hills Plat Second Addition - <br /> <br /> COun~lme~ber Schlueter stated she finds it difficult to go with accepting <br /> rightTof~ay easements and certain acreage on Hwy. 47 from the developer <br /> as ~ ~ra~e-off for the open space requirement~ allowing this type of <br /> dens~[~y ~lth no open space required. Councilmember Schlueter stated that <br /> she ifOre~ees a clrastic change in street use configuration and she is <br /> con~eFne~ with the safety of the people crossing Hwy. 47 to get to that <br /> par~; i'.she would like to see that amount of people provided with a play <br /> are~ ~n 6rder to keep them confined and away from traffic hazards. She <br /> req~e~te4 that this concern be addressed when this plat goes back to <br /> Planning land Zoning. <br /> <br /> Mr. ~D!ckiCarson replied that there is open land behind the courtyard <br /> tYPe hou%~ing that could be developed as City park. <br /> <br /> May°r Ga~ec stated that he does not think it would be right for this <br /> Oo~C.il to break an agreement made by a previous Council; that one <br /> acre of 9Pen space will not suffice as a park area for the entire PUD. <br /> Mr~i JOhn~ Lichter, mem~r of Park and Recreation Commission, stated that <br /> this isam~ subject was discussed at a previous Park Board meeting and <br /> ~t W~s ~termined that high density areas should consider the inclusion <br /> of i~ .tot ~ots' . Mr. Lichter also stated that the open space Mr. Carson <br /> refeZre~ to has no access. <br /> <br /> Mr. Car~on replied that a 10-15' easement has been provided for access <br /> to that iopen space. <br /> <br /> Co~n¢il~ember Schlueter referred to Item 95 in the findings of fact <br /> an~ ~eqgested 'that when this plat goes back to Planning and Zoning, that <br /> th~y'/corisider this fact with a little more scrutiny. Councilmember <br /> So~l~e~r that she too has talked with the school district and confirms <br /> that!i there will be no burden there, but staff was not addressed. A <br /> deVe!o~ent of this size will create an extra amount of work for the City. <br /> <br /> Mr~ -~v~on replied that the developer is being assessed an extra 5% by <br /> the 'City to cover administrative costs. <br /> <br /> Co'ii'ember Schlueter stated that she would like to discuss Environmental <br /> AsSessment Worksheet being included in PUDs, which she will bring up <br /> dUr~g .~ayor/Council Input. <br /> <br /> MayOr .G~mec Stated that in anticipating future development in the area, <br /> th~ ~.sug~estion for park development made by Mr. Carson sounds very <br /> fe~ib!~; a park in this location would also qualify for metro funding <br /> be~usel it would be in the urban area. <br /> <br />  C/February 28, 1984 <br /> <br /> <br />