Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Motion ~rie~. voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg Reimann, <br />Schluete~ndilVan~ Wagner. Voting No: None. <br />Case %17~ Fl~ntwood Hills Plat Second Addition (Planned Unit Development) <br /> '(A'~ Preliminary A~roval And Rezonin~ For Flintwood Hills Plat <br /> S%~ond Addition (PUD); B. Receiving Feasibility Re~ort For <br /> ..~eral Sanitar~ Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermain And Street <br /> ~struction For Flintwood Hills Plat Second Addition): <br /> <br />a) Preli~ina~y Approval and Retorting For Flintwood Hills Plat Second Addition - <br /> <br /> Coun~ilme~%ber Schlueter stated she finds it difficult to go with accepting <br /> r~ght~-of~way easements and certain acreage on Hwy. 47 from the developer <br /> as a~rad~-off for the open space requirement; allowing this type of <br /> dens~y With no open space required. Councilmember Schlueter stated that <br /> she f~res~es a drastic change in street use configuration and she is <br /> conce~nediwith the safety of the people crossing Hwy. 47 to get to that <br /> park} !shei would like to see that amount of people provided with a play <br /> area in Okder to keep them confined and away from traffic hazards. She <br /> reqUeSted! that this concern be addressed when this plat goes back to <br /> Plan~ing and Zoning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dick .~arson replied that there is open land behind the courtyard <br /> type housing that could be developed as City park. <br /> <br /> Mayor~Ga~ec stated that he does not think it would be right for this <br /> coUn~ ~1 ,~o break an agreement made by a previous Council; that one <br /> acr~ Of o~en space will not suffice as a park area for the entire PUD. <br /> <br /> Mr. iJ~hn'ILichter, member of Park and Recreation Commission, stated that <br /> thi~ ~am~ subject was discussed at a previous Park Board meeting and <br /> it Was ~etermined that high density areas should consider the inclusion <br /> of 'itOt ~ots'. Mr. Lichter also stated that the open space Mr. Carson <br /> refer~ed'to has no access. <br /> <br /> Mr Carsqn replied that a 10-15' easement has been provided for access <br /> to that Open space. <br /> <br /> coUac!lm~k~r Schlueter referred to Item #5 in the findings of fact <br /> and~r~q~sted that when this plat goes back to Planning and Zoning, that <br /> they oonsider this fact with a little more scrutiny. Councilmember <br /> Schl~ete~ that she too has talked with the school district and confirms <br /> ~hat ~he~e will be no burden there, but staff was not addressed. A <br /> developm%nt of this size will create an extra amount of work for the City. <br /> <br /> Mr.~ ~ars~n replied that the developer is being assessed an extra 5% by <br /> the~ Citylto cover administrative costs. <br /> <br /> Coundilm~mber Schlueter stated that she would like to discuss Environmental <br /> AsseSsment Worksheet bein~ included in PUDs, which she will bring up <br /> during ~yor/Council Input. <br /> <br /> MayOr Ga~ec stated that in anticipating future development in the area, <br /> thel ~ug~stion for park development made by Mr. Carson sounds very <br /> fea~bl~ a park in this location would also qualify for metro funding <br /> beCa~sei~t Wo%lldbe in the urban area. <br /> <br />C/February 28, 1984 <br />Page 18 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />