Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CommissiOner Rendriksen stated that his reason for abstaining on the previous <br />motion was. the fact that he was not present for the entire public hearing. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson informed Ms. Dickman that the motion to disapprove is only <br />a recomme~dat!on to Council and the case will go before Council on March 27, <br />1984. He also informed Ms. Dickman that the minutes from tonight's meeting <br />will be forwarded to Council. <br /> <br />Case #3: ~Request To Subdivide B~ Metes And Bounds; Case Of Mr. Gary Dovel: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />present. <br /> <br />Chairman ~eterson stated that Staff is concerned that if for some reason, <br />at some pointI in time, Mr. Dqvel's plans to purchase the second 10 acre <br />parcel on'a contract for deed fall through, the City will be left with a <br />landlocked Piece of property. The proposed agreement specifies that if <br />the applicanti fails to purchase that 10 acre parcel, he will plat the entire <br />parcel according to subdivision code of Ramsey and provide access to that <br />property. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is that Mr. Dovel should incorporate the west 33' of <br />the front parcel as part of the contract for deed parcel. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is to delete Item #2 from the development contract. <br /> <br />Motion by. commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to <br />recommend approval of a subdivision of ten acres in the NE¼ of the NW¼ <br />of Section 8& Township 32, Range 25, City of Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota, <br />based on the iamended development contract and contingent upon the applicant <br />entering intQ a development agreement with the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Deemer, Kennen, <br />Zimmerman, LaDue and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner <br />Johnson, <br /> <br />Case ~4: _Request For Conce~t Appro¥_al Of A Sketch Plan; Case Of Mr. Arthur <br /> <br />Mr. RaudiO was present. <br /> <br />~ne sketch plan is for a portion of property adjacent to the Rum River and just <br />east of T.H~ #47. River lots would be approximately 90' wide and 200' in <br />depth, meeting DNR requirements. Off-river lots w~uld be approximately <br />90'x135', The roadway may vary slightly than what is shown in the configuration. <br />There is a lot of wooded property and every effort will be made to make it an <br />aesthetic development as possible. One-hundred and fifteen single family <br />dwellings are planned. <br /> <br />ChairmanPeterson inquired as to how much land is involved; it appears that <br />not all of the property is platted on the sketch plan? <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio replied that some of the land is subject to DNR consideration <br />regarding adding fill to make it buildable. <br /> <br />DiscussiOn ensued regarding the MSA street through the project and at what <br />point it will enter Hwy. 47. ~ <br /> <br />P & Z/March 6,~1984 <br /> Page 7 of l0 <br /> <br /> <br />