Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> <br /> traffic ~at~ernsr~ ~ have created adverse impacts with respect to <br />traffic entering or leaving the current site or on adjacent <br />roads. Ther~ has not been a traffic accident at the entrance to <br />the fac~l~tyl for its fourteen year life. The grant of a Condi- <br />tional Us~ ~ermit would not affect current traffic patterns as <br />they ex~s~ ~n the area. Nor would the grant of the Conditional <br />User Permit ~ignificantly increase the volume of truck traffic to <br />and from .ith~ landfill site, except for the potential projected <br />increase of 5% per year. (July 3, 1984 testimony of Donald <br />Otter.) The Commission finds that access to the site is good and <br />no roadway ul~grading is needed. <br /> <br /> e. The Total Nu~er of Similar Uses Within the City. <br /> [170.016D Standards for Consideration]. <br /> <br /> 15. ~ similar uses exist within the city, one is the <br />immediately !adjacent Anoka/Ramsey mixed municipal solid waste <br />landfill~andithe other is a clean fill waste landfill within one <br />mile of the proposed uses. <br /> <br />Whether or Not the Use Will Be Dangerous or <br />Otherwise Detrimental to Persons Residin~ or <br /> <br />Workin~ in the Vicinity of the Use or to the <br />Public Welfare, and Whether or Not it Will Sub- <br />stantially Impair the Use, Enjoyment or Value of <br /> <br />any Property. <br />eration]. <br /> <br />[170.016D Standards for Consid- <br /> <br /> 16. iTh~ extension of the Anoka/Ramsey Landfill operations <br />into the North 80 environmental improvement and into the South 70 <br />expansion w~uld be pursuant to Waste Management ' s Accident <br />PreventiOn. a~d Safety Program (Plans, Section III.I.) and would <br /> <br /> <br />